- Because they painted scenes of life as ordinary people lived it, rather than scenes from myths, many nineteenth-century American artists differed from earlier times. No error.
I had an objection of D as wrong. Though it is, it still makes sense if one removed the word nineteenth-century. That is, because it describes American artists of those earlier times. So what is wrong with it?
The artists differed from artists of earlier times, not from the times themselves.
Get used to questions of this type.
How did you detect that there is a contrast? I interpreted it as just saying differed with no comparison.
I have no idea what you mean?
I meant that it could be saying “it differed” without comparison, and the phrase from earlier times just shows the era of the artists.
“To differ” implies a comparison, inherently.
It’s like saying “The dog was similar.” That doesn’t make sense on its own, does it? Similar to WHAT? In your sentence, you have an answer: Different from what? The artists in earlier times.
When you see a phrase like “differ from X,” your first assumption should be that “differ” and “from” are working together. There might be an exception, but I cant think of one.
Okay, thank you all @WasatchWriter and @bodangles .
B is correct answer, right ?
What does “it” stand for ? Ordinary people lived it ???
Life.
Rephrase to see:
They painted life as it was lived by ordinary people.