<p>The African tsetse fly does not need a (brain, everything) it has to do in life is programmed into its nervous system.</p>
<p>a. brain, everything
b. brain due to everything which
c. brain, for everything
d. brain; since, everything
e. brain whereas everything
Answer: D</p>
<p>London differs from other cities, such as Paris and New York, in that its shopping areas are so widely spread out.
How come the answer is not "in that"?</p>
<p>The architect's research shows that even when builders (construct) houses (of stone), they (still) use the hammer more than (any tool)
Answer: any tool</p>
<p>The television (has received) many complaints (about) the clothing advertisements, (which some) viewers condemn (to be) tasteless
Answer: to be</p>
<p>Hmmm, not sure about number one. I thought it was the one with ‘for’…can someone clarify?</p>
<p>There is nothing wrong with ‘in that’
It should be ‘any other tool’ - any tool refers to hammer as well.
And the last should be ‘as’ tasteless. People condemn thing as tasteless not to be tasteless.</p>
<p>For the first one, i do not understand why it is d. I would have said C because “for…” is a conjunction to be placed after the comma, whereas “since,” is a subordination clause and therefore, it makes the clause after the semicolon dependent. </p>
<p>In that is just another way of saying “because”. So its perfectly acceptable. </p>
<p>It should be any other tool.</p>
<p>I don’t know how to explain that, but it should be “as” instead of “to be”</p>
<p>1) is a bad problem. Is it BB? The original error in the sentence is the use of the comma. The comma should be replaced by a semicolon because the sentence is made of 2 independent clauses. However, in answer (d), the use of “since” gets rid of the need for a semicolon by turning the second half into a dependent clause. Therefore, the use of the semicolon is wrong.</p>