I applied to the EECS track, and I got rejected. Iām not bitter about it or anything, but I would like opinions as to why.
GPA: 4.0/4.0 unweighted
PSAT: not submitted because the scores didnāt come in time
ACT: did not take
SAT: 2400
APs:
Freshman: Biology and US History (both 5ās)
Sophomore: World History, Calculus BC, Physics 1 (all 5ās)
Current: U.S. Government, Chemistry, Statistics, Environmental Science, Physics 2
*No classes with computer science or engineering in general
Experience: None. But that was the point, wasnāt it, to foster an interest and GET experience?
Extra curricular activities: Debate (captain, won several invitationals), dance (letās just say for MANY years), varsity tennis, art, service organization at school (about 80 cumulative hours, some awards), fashion design
Volunteer: Feed My Starving Children food packing, service organization hours (related with local community), freshman orientation (2 years), library helper, local church coffee bar helper
Essays: This is where I suspect the problem was. I would consider myself a storyteller, so I wanted to reflect my creative side with the essays. The last 2 were decently standard, I think. For Essay #3, I wrote about a sports injury and how I overcame the difficulties that it presented me with. For Essay #4, I wrote about my passion for fashion design and linked the entire design process with math and science, specifically how both art and STEM redefine beauty. The first 2 essays might have been too out of the box. I wrote Essay #1 (what I hope to accomplish) in the format of an action storyā¦lots of āspecial-effectsā type scenes and exciting pacing. The plot follows the 2016 EECS team many years in the future as they use their skills to save the World Computer from destruction. I emphasized the computer programming, advanced math, and electrical engineering skills that the camp advertised. For Essay #2 (interest in STEM and its effect on your life), I wrote a poem in a series of rhyming couplets that lyrically expressed my passion for STEM and the fascination that its many realms encapsulates me in. I emphasized in this essay how I constantly think about the inspirational scientific advances and relate them to my quotidian experiences. Itās kind of like āAlice in Wonderlandā style; I fall into the flowerās STEM and become quickly absorbed by all sorts of new discoveries (like CRISPR, quantum communications, and black holes). Anyway, I thought all of my essays were really good, and I still donāt see a problem with them. The whole point of the essays is to showcase your unique perspective on the world, isnāt it? Or maybe I should stick to the formula and go traditional style for college apps? I donāt know, because all the advice that the colleges give FORMALLY is that you shouldnāt worry about anything except EXPRESSING YOURSELF FULLY in the essays, and thatās what I did, but now I donāt know because that doesnāt seem to be what MIT WTP was looking for.
Teacher Recommendations: Didnāt get to read them, but I think both of them were pretty good. My teachers understand me fairly well, I think, and can express my interest in the STEM fields.
Anyway, thanks for reading all this. Congratulations to everyone who got accepted, and PLEASE, if anyone has any ideas about why I got rejected, Iād love to hear it!