<p>Basically, I was leafing through a Princeton Review book the other day at Border's (I think it was 361 best colleges or something, but I forget) and noticed that in terms of selectivity, the author only gave a 96/100 rating to Yale while peer institutions (Harvard, Princeton, Columbia, etc) <em>all</em> had a 99/100 selectivity ranking. Seeing as Yale's acceptance rate was something like 5.8% for RD admits this year, this seems like an aberration.</p>
<p>Agreed with the above. Schools that are obviously more selective than others sometimes get lower selectivity scores than the less selective ones. All of PR's numbers--unless reported directly by the college--and rankings are flawed and to be taken with a grain (or a whole barrel) of salt.</p>
<p>If memory serves, last year, for academic quality, the PR (in its eternal wisdom) granted Brown University a rating of 75 or 80. It was ridiculously low. I am sure they fixed it this year.</p>
<p>Amherst was ranked 7th worst in financial aid this year, even though they meet 100% of need and don't require any loans.</p>
<p>PR's value is entirely in the descriptions of academics and the student body that give you some idea of what the school "feels" like. There is almost no value in the rankings.</p>
<p>Need is what a school determines to be need.
What I don't understand is, the federal government says we should only have to pay x amount, and the Office of Financial Aid somehow decides that it's reasonable to conclude that we can somehow pay three times that amount.</p>
<p>NYU doesn't guarantee to meet 100 percent demonstrated need, and they pretty much gave me the same package, so, hey, I guess those rankings really are meaningless.</p>
<p>Tons of colleges guarantee to "meet 100 percent of demonstrated need," but not many of them top the list.</p>
<p>I agree with PR "Top ______ schools" but the rest is crap.</p>
<p>I mean as Catfish said most schools like Amherst($1.5 Billion in Endowment) will grant 100% FA need. Harvard and Brown no longer allow you to graduate with debt in most cases.</p>
<p>So, would John McCain have become who is now if he hadn't been white?</p>
<p>Can we assume that his admission to the Naval Academy may have been influenced by being the son and grandson of four-star admirals?</p>
<p>His father graduated from the Naval Academy in 1931, eighteen years before that institution first graduated a black student, and thirteen years before there the Navy commissioned its first black officers. Had McCain's father and grandfather been black, it's a very safe bet they wouldn't have become four star admirals, and likely that John would have had to find another school to scrape through.</p>