<p>Vicarious Parent asks about Yale v. Princeton in Creative Writing so I sashayed over to Princeton’s Creative Writing web pages, which I followed up with a look at their English Dept. although I must say I do not personally know anyone with a PhD in English from Princeton (Comp. Lit, that’s another story).</p>
<p>Signs of trouble, oh Princeton Alums (again, I don’t know many) in Creative Writing. One, what is this “temporary relocation” to “New South”? In the politics of universities, real estate is It. Location, location, location. It looks to me as if P-tons’s Creative Writing program has been shuttled off… to… someplace near the train station? To make it easier for writers to come in for a day and commute back to, well, wherever? And why is the web site so empty? And where are the writing prizes? And where are the literature courses, or, barring that, tie-ins to other areas of the curriculum?</p>
<p>What Princeton’s program has going for it (again, just from looking at the site). Jeffrey Eugenides is an incredibly talented writer of fiction. Anyplace that has him knows what they’re doing. Ditto, Chang-rae Lee. They have two visitors (you have to really squirrel down in the site to find them), Colm Toibin who is ferociously talented, and Leonard Barkan. There are some mega-names, here. </p>
<p>What I like in P-ton’s writing program, for an undergrad, is this: they include translation! Yes! They have a certificate program, meaning, it is NOT a major, but rather, related to one’s major. They have a history and intention (it seems) of being aligned with the study of the arts. All of that, excellent. But… the stress is on names, and, well, there definitely seems to be a caste system, as in, many people who are listed as teaching whose photos and credentials don’t appear. Again, just from the site, the self-promotional aspect (kudos to the program from two of its star faculty) is really peculiar. Now, the reading series is really imaginative: a younger writer paired with an old lion. And a very smart tie with translation. Further, there are some great people in Princeton English, teaching LIT courses. Like Susan Stewart, a superb poet and critic. Diana Fuss. Excellent people in Princeton English doing Postcolonial. At least one doing Latino lit and performance who is clearly a rising star…But, but… there’s no evidence of dialogue between English-Creative writing. Or Science-Creative writing. Or (say) Russian-Creative Writing. Why not? Some kinda local politics goin’ on, I think. </p>
<p>Yale’s Creative Writing, very briefly. I am impressed by 1) strong stress on non-fiction writing by practicing journalists. Non-fiction writing is where the future of journalism and much of the book trade is. 2) Impressive that it is based in English, as should be. 3) Impressive that it is directly linked to arts criticism, another way that actual writers actually make a living or, barring that, get funding in between advances, and get contracts for books, etc. 4) If you want to write poetry, take a course with John Hollander. </p>
<p>I do not know if I answered your question, vicariousparent. Evaluating Creative Writing programs is such a tricky business that I believe the NRC report has been delayed for eight years just to avoid doing so…</p>