<p>This is from "back in the day" but my older brother retired as a newspaper journalist. </p>
<p>First, he took his undergraduate degree in liberal arts, studying everything related to Social Science and English (his major) that fascinated him. He learned how to tackle ANY new subject that came his way, had a great sense of detail, and ear for dialogue and how people spoke, passion for the American political process, and a circle of friends that encompassed many other majors and areas of interest. His college EC's included hosting a talk radio show. He was a Renaissance man who believed in becoming EDUCATED. He knows his History like you can't believe. The English major gave him strong analytic and writing skills but in no way equipped him to work for a newspaper all by itself.
In fact, the social science courses, and the critiques of professors to sharpen his critical thinking, were crucial to his observation and reporting skills.</p>
<p>He taught English for a year but disliked the culture. He thought he disliked working under so much structure, but when the structure became newspaper structure, he discovered that he thrived with it.</p>
<p>So he took a one-year masters degree in journalism at the Univ. of New Hampshire which fine-tuned all of his skills in a focussed way that newspapers needed at that time. </p>
<p>He worked for one of the last family-owned newspapers in the country and withstood every recession because he was flexible and capable of doing many jobs on that paper. He was their MVP. The bosses could fit him into anything and he could handle it, because of his non-careerist undergraduate approach, top-shelf education, followed by the professional focus of the masters degree.</p>
<p>At various points, the Editor had him cover local political news in several towns and write his own feature column with picture and byline. He was a copy editor, th features editor, then at one point he worked a 4 a.m. shift because he alone could understand the incoming international news as it came off the wire and determine what was important to pursue for that day. </p>
<p>He did not make a lot of money but could always sustain himself. He loved his work. He never had children but frankly his scrapbooks of columns are a kind of legacy that everyone in the extended family appreciates. As we all savor our old family photo albums, he gets to leaf through his columns and the letters-to-the-editor that they sometimes engendered. </p>
<p>Certainly you wouldn't want to repeat his exact path, but I'm wondering why even worry about undergrad major IF there are still one-year masters programs around to get the latest, newest jobsite skills, following an excellent
liberal arts foundation. </p>
<p>I think if he'd tried to jump right from his B.A. into newspaper work, he might have been like too many reporters he saw around himself all the time, hired and fired. The masters degree gave him that difference.</p>
<p>Hope this helps.</p>