<p>I can sum up the correlation in one sentence: It all depends on which high school you go, the courses you take, and the amount of self-prep. If this is some kind of an "experiment," it might be helpful to know that many on this board are upper-middle class to upper class, attend great schools, can afford tutors, etc... You must take these factors into consideration.</p>
<p>4.0 Uw - 2070</p>
<p>School doesn't rank.</p>
<p>3.68 uw, 3.98 w(+1 for AP and certain honors)
2210 (cr:800 m: 670 w:740)</p>
<p>4.0 unweighted</p>
<p>(I took the old SAT, but I'll add in my writing score with my previous SAT I score.)</p>
<p>2210</p>
<p>3.9 / 2250</p>
<p>3.90uw (darn junior year...Oh, A-/A/A+ = 4.0 for my school), 4.24w
2120</p>
<p>4.0uw / 2080</p>
<p>Harvard2011 - or if u try in school or not</p>
<p>Harvard2011: Suffice it to say, I don't think many on here have tutors or attend(ed) prestigious private high schools either. (We're mainly middle class, not upper class.)</p>
<p>It's just many on here care more about school; or else why would they even bother spending time here?</p>
<p>GPA: 4.5
SAT: 1680
Rank: 3/32</p>
<p>I have a good gpa but horrible SAT ;-;</p>
<p>This was last year...
GPA: 3.87
SAT (old): 1580 + 800 Writing SAT II</p>
<p>3.8 GPA on a 4.4 scale (between A- and A)
1390 SAT highest</p>
<p>GPA reflects nothing but your ability to bs and how much effort you put into something and how good your memory is.</p>
<p>GPA: 3.9something uw
SAT: 1940 (1270 + 670)</p>
<p>I hate SATs...</p>
<p>So what were the conclusions?</p>
<p>3.8w/3.53uw
1900 (m:740 R:600 W:560)</p>