<p>Re: YaleBound72
"ED: You applied ED to pton in good faith. You never contmplated this unexpected gift from TAM. You were naive, perhaps, but not calculating. And you didn't write the rules, Pton did.And ED is a bad deal for needy students. You are a victim of the ED system. Don't let this be a factor."</p>
<p>What do you mean "applying to Princeton in good faith?" Everyone applies to Princeton in good faith with the hope of gaining acceptance. And even if Valdez did not contemplate the gift from A&M, he still made a commitment. As I have read in Valdez's past posts, he is "well-off" from a "wealthy suburb" in Texas. ED is a bad deal for needy students, but Valdez isn't needy. He is not a victim of the ED system: he opted to use it, and now he is facing consequences. And that too, the consequences are not any harsher than those imposed on other families.</p>
<p>Whatever the intentions, whether naive or calculating, Valdez landed himself in this situation. He could either lie to Princeton and say that there is absolutely no way he could afford their tuition (if it were impossible for him to afford the tuition, then this debate wouldn't come up in the first place), or he could admit the discomfort of paying upon himself. </p>
<p>Princeton, I feel, seems expensive because it is being compared to a great deal at Texas A&M University. Sure, people may be getting great deals, but, as Valdez read (supposedly) in the ED agreement, applicants agree to enroll at Princeton unless they absolutely cannot afford it.</p>
<p>The deal at A&M is good, but just because something better comes along does not allow you to break a commitment.</p>