<p>What are the policies at your school concerning co-curricular and extra-curricular activities (not athletics) like? How extensive are they? Have they had an effect on the actions of students? Or are they just something people sign and forget about?</p>
<p>Without getting into too much background detail, our school is about to enact a new drug and alcohol policy encompassing both co- and extra-curricular activities, in addition to athletics, which are already restricted. The problem is working out the details.</p>
<p>Now I believe the school has complete jurisdiction over this. The school and community are giving us these activities as privileges and they have the right to take those away. I also understand extra punishment for "student leaders," though if kids are justifying their behavior just because "well he/she is doing it," then i think we should examine how we're teaching our kids to make choices, but yet again, that's not the point. It's the technicalities of the policy that I disagree with.</p>
<p>I have a few main concerns with the policy as it stands:
2nd/3rd offenses are grounds for being kicked off of an activity for one school year/rest of high school career. But if they aren't doing any ECs, doesn't that just leave more time for alcohol and drugs? I think it's important to get kids back into ECs as soon as possible. Also consider the amount of "growing up" that occurs during three years of high school. How does your school handle this?</p>
<p>If a student is found not guilty in a court of law of say, alcohol consumption, they can still be found guilty by our school. While I suppose these are two different spheres, I've always considered a court of law to be above that of a school. Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but I found that slightly disturbing.</p>
<p>There should be an appeal process of some sort, I believe, whether immediately or after a set period of time. While students can't file complains against other students, one issue I'm worried about is parents whose children have been punished beginning to seek out and file complaints against other students as some sort of revenge. Maybe I'm being skeptical, but I wouldn't be surprised.</p>
<p>A couple other student council members and I went to the school board meeting last night to get more info and voice our concerns. I got up to make my point that I know was stated before but needed to be reiterated: students who are at parties but not drinking should not be punished. I understand the motives of this (parents not wanting their children around it, administrators hoping to "ostracize" the drinkers--haha right), but if anything, someone at a party not drinking acts as a much better deterrent than any policy ever would. Of course, I get done saying this only to be condescended to by the superintendent that "that was never part of the policy, only some discussion at the beginning." But I talked to the SC president, who was there last week, I even read her notes, and that's basically the only aspect of the issue they talked about the whole time. So he basically embarrassed me in front of everyone for no reason. Frustrating.</p>
<p>Anyway, I'm trying to make this as short as possible. So, what do you think? I don't want this to turn into a "drinking and drugs are bad/drinking and drugs are good" debate, but just about the policy.</p>