Your strong subject and weak subject

<p>I personally want to know your best/worst subject. In terms of academic courses, I'm like one of those good at Math and Science, but suck so bad at English(See? I capitalized math and science already. No kidding) and Social Studies.</p>

<p>But I'd say my strong subjects is music and math(specifically algebra 1 and 2).
My weakness is English, I just suck at writing, reading, and grammar.</p>

<p>*Feel free to add electives instead of just academics!</p>

<p>Edit: I just noticed I wrote "I just suck at writing, reading, and grammar." lol Grammar's a noun and writing/reading are verbs... I wish I was better in English.</p>

<p>STRENGTH: Chemistry and Economics</p>

<p>WEAKNESS: Math and Physics</p>

<p>Does this make sense at all?</p>

<p>Nope.</p>

<p>Best:</p>

<p>Economics, Calculus, Stats - math is without a doubt my strongest subject</p>

<p>Worst:</p>

<p>AP English Lit - I can write decent essays and my grammar is fine, but my reading/literature skills are poor compared to many.</p>

<p>I agree Hilsa..</p>

<p>Strong: Spanish, chemistry, biology, English</p>

<p>Weak: History, I guess. Way too many notes that I just can't be bothered with. And I'm sorry that I suck at writing formulaic essays...</p>

<p>weaknesses: french
strengths: everything else</p>

<p>i'm one of those people that can't really learn a 2nd language. english is too deep in my brain stem. so i'll never speak fluent french, but i could write a book on english grammar(granted, i don't use proper grammar on forums like CC, but i do know all the rules)</p>

<p>ChoklitRain, it's harder for most people to learn a second language proficiently when you start learning it later in life as opposed to when you were a toddler.</p>

<p>And if you're good at everything else, then it really doesn't matter. :)</p>

<p>Strengths: Spanish, Math etc
Weakness: USH</p>

<p>I'm not actually bad at APUSH. The class is just a GPA killer :P</p>

<p>I'm one of the few that's apathetic to all subjects, in terms of relative context. That means that my skill level is equal in all subjects, again, in relative context, so basically I fail at all of them.</p>

<p>If I had to, I'd give science a bit of a plus, and history a massive epic failure.</p>

<p>Usually people are either good at science and math or good at english and history.</p>

<p>I'm the latter.</p>

<p>
[quote]
Usually people are either good at science and math or good at english and history

[/quote]

Huh? From my experience and observations, people who own at reading/writing (english) also own at math/science. And they suck more at history.</p>

<p>History is the only oddball IMO, but eh, guess it depends.</p>

<p>Strengths: English, History, Foreign Language
Weaknesses: Math, (Math) Science (I'm good at sciences like Enviro and Bio, but not Chem and Physics)</p>

<p>English is sorta natural for me, and I actually like APUSH, everyone else in my class seems to hate it...Strange .____. </p>

<p>I've always hated math. ALWAYS. The only math I liked was Geometry, now I'm in Pre-calc...and I HATE IT SO MUCH. I want it to die... >> I wish math was a person so I could kill it! -__-</p>

<p>I LOVED Bio last year, but Chem sucks so bad this year...it's mostly my teacher...hair-brained lady who doesn't really teach.</p>

<p>theReach... it doesn't work like that for me!</p>

<p>Strengths: English, Spanish,
Weaknesses: History
Acceptable: Physics, Math</p>

<p>In terms of marks:</p>

<p>Strength: Chemistry
Weakness: Physics</p>

<p>^You're like me! I feel more normal now that someone else does well in chemistry and not-so-well at physics! =]</p>

<p>@Invoyable</p>

<p>I think it as math and science needing practical skills such as knowledge of formulas and memorization of ideas. English and history are more of needing use of a more logical approach, and tend to be more open in terms of interpretation.</p>

<p>
[quote]
I think it as math and science needing practical skills such as knowledge of formulas and memorization of ideas. English and history are more of needing use of a more logical approach, and tend to be more open in terms of interpretation.

[/quote]

I think that it's slightly the opposite; math and science are more conceptual and logically approached, somewhat open to interpretation, English is somewhat similar with writing but more interpretative.</p>

<p>History is plain memorization, period. Oh yes, inb4AP <em>inserthistorytitlehere</em> "critical thinking" hogwash.</p>

<p>OMG YES.
-dies at history-</p>

<p>Strength: English, history, government, art, microeconomics, chemistry</p>

<p>Weakness: PHYSICS</p>

<p>
[quote]

I think it as math and science needing practical skills such as knowledge of formulas and memorization of ideas. English and history are more of needing use of a more logical approach, and tend to be more open in terms of interpretation.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>I disagree. Memorizing formulas can only get you so far in math/science. English and history are complete memorization, at least at the HS level. Even at the AP level, history essays are all about knowing the outside info you memorized and satisfying the rubric.</p>