20 Schools Spend $1,000,000+ on Athletic Recruitment...

<p>Nearly half of the nation’s largest athletics programs have doubled or tripled their recruitment spending over the past decade, as their pursuit of elite athletes intensifies and becomes more national in scope.</p>

<p>Forty-eight percent of NCAA Division I athletics departments at least doubled their recruiting budgets from 1997 to 2007, according to a Chronicle analysis of financial data reported to the U.S. Department of Education. Of the 300 Division I institutions for which data were available, 21 each spent more than $1-million chasing talented players in the 2007 academic year.</p>

<p>On the whole, the 65 biggest spenders shelled out a total of more than $61-million in 2007, an 86-percent increase from 10 years before. That amount does not include salaries for recruiting coordinators or construction and operating costs of the gleaming multimillion-dollar facilities that help lure prospects.</p>

<p>Biggest Spenders:</p>

<li> U. of Tennessee at Knoxville - $2,005,700</li>
<li> U. of Notre Dame - 1,758,300</li>
<li> U. of Florida - 1,451,400</li>
<li> Auburn U. - 1,374,900</li>
<li> Kansas State U. - 1,316,700</li>
<li> U. of Georgia - 1,284,000</li>
<li> U. of Nebraska at Lincoln - 1,275,000</li>
<li> U. of Arkansas at Fayetteville - 1,259,700</li>
<li> Duke U. - 1,245,300</li>
<li> Ohio State U. - 1,236,800</li>
</ol>

<p>Ivy League Athletic Recruitment Expenditures 2006/2007</p>

<li> Princeton U. - $941,000</li>
<li> Harvard U. - 851,900</li>
<li> Columbia U. - 778,000</li>
<li> Dartmouth College - 774,700</li>
<li> Brown U. - 757,200</li>
<li> Cornell U. - 752,800</li>
<li> Yale U. - 748,300</li>
<li> U. of Pennsylvania - 643,600</li>
</ol>

<p>FULL STORY [The</a> Chronicle of Higher Education](<a href=“http://chronicle.com/weekly/v54/i47/47a00102.htm#spenders]The”>http://chronicle.com/weekly/v54/i47/47a00102.htm#spenders)</p>

<p>What a waste of money...
Why not use this money for research or something else of more importance?</p>

<p>Waste of money? Well, check out the $70million Jordon Hall of Science at Notre Dame, paid for with profits from the athletic program:
<a href="http://science.nd.edu/jordan/%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://science.nd.edu/jordan/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>Would you object to spending $$ for other forms of recruitment? Mass mailings to promote the school? Outreach for underserved populations?</p>

<p>^what could be more important than watching your school kick its rival's ass in football?</p>

<p>I'd guess all of those schools make a pretty good income on sports except maybe KSU. How much has basketball done for Duke's profile?</p>

<p>UTK spent that much on athletic recruitment while cutting three academic programs this year due to budget shortages?</p>

<p>Figures.</p>

<p>Hey, Rutgers is spending over 100 million on a new football stadium. Word is they're running short on money - and if they can't finish by 2009, the head coach can walk away from his contract. Rutgers is experiencing lots of cutbacks lately so I'm not sure this is the best time to go forward with this - the optics are certainly not good.
Overall though, there ARE some D1 programs that are completely self supporting. PSU football , for example, runs a big profit every year and plows it back into the program AND funds other less popular sports. Seems OK to me.</p>

<p>UT athletics is not in the business of funding the academic programs. That's the state's job. The business of the AD is to make money and win games.</p>

<p>I'd rather they spent it on athletic recruitment than on the junk mail that my daughter gets even after telling them that she is not interested in their school.</p>

<p>
[quote]
what could be more important than watching your school kick its rival's ass in football?

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Pretty poor ROI on Notre Dame's expenditure.</p>

<p>^^^ lol archiemom...</p>

<p>
[quote]
Pretty poor ROI on Notre Dame's expenditure.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Ouch. That hurt.</p>

<p>(OP - The linked article cannot be read without subscription)</p>

<p>I don't see this as a big deal. The expenditures are not going to the prospective students, other than in the form of official visits (cheapest available airfare, lodging and meals), so the money spent is supporting jobs and the economy in other ways, I presume.</p>

<p>If I could wave a magic wand: make the cheapskate suckers who run the NBA and the NFL do what major league baseball does and establish thier own farm systems instead of using Div 1 as their training ground. That way the kids who wanted to turn pro could go there, the schools would spend money on student athletes, not aspring pros, and you'd end the rampant corruption and recuriting shennanigans that bedevils so many big time college basketball and football teams. </p>

<p>Let the collges reserve their recuriting dollars for the non-money sports.</p>

<p>...loving said as an alum (and spouse of an alum) (and daughter-in-law of an alum). </p>

<p>But also as a parent of a rejected applicant :p .</p>

<p>Well, the softly spoken other side of the story is that the big time sports schools need $$$ football to fund the non-revenue sports, including womens athletics. That's essentially a mandate of Title 10; and another reason why every major college now has a womens' softball team. Let's not forget that female athletes are recruited too, and rightfully so.</p>

<p>Besides ticket sales and stuff, Athletics bring in a lot of $$ in terms of donations from alumni. This past homecoming at Dartmouth, we beat Columbia (in a very exciting game), and the school received a record $72 million in donations that weekend. Coincidence? I think not!</p>

<p>Granted, Dartmouth Alumni are crazy for their school, so Dartmouth fares well even if the team doesn't win. I would imagine something similar happens at other schools known for their loyal-to-the-death alumni (Notre Dame, Michigan).</p>

<p>Dartmouth should never lose to Columbia in football.</p>

<p>Barrons, need I remind you that the mighty Columbia Lions obliterated Stanford in the 1939 Rose Bowl, 7-0?</p>

<p>Was Lou Gehrig on that team?</p>