<p>^^ Yeah…</p>
<p>I though the MC was fairly difficult, but it could’ve worse, I guess.</p>
<p>The FR was fairly BSable… so we’ll see.</p>
<p>I though the MC was fairly difficult, but it could’ve worse, I guess.</p>
<p>The FR was fairly BSable… so we’ll see.</p>
<p>Exactly</p>
<p>@azndarkvader Well I gave you everything you needed to know about El Nino…</p>
<p>The whole test was such a joke. They just gave a few unfair MC questions but nothing too bad.</p>
<p>FRQ was total cake but MC tripped me up =/ i hate how some of those questions and answers were so ambiguous :(</p>
<p>thanks to whoever posted the new york earth science teacher review/cram study guide thing. That’s the only thing I read for this exam the entire year, and I thought MC was incredibly easy, while free response was a joke.</p>
<p>there are so many overlapping topics with ap bio and agriscience…</p>
<p>*** are zebra mussels. shoot me.</p>
<p>*** last question</p>
<p>yeah, last question was kind of hard. Every question asked for like two blah blahs and I could only give one example :(</p>
<p>what are two reasons for rising sea levels because of increase in global temperatures?</p>
<p>I said obviously the polar ice caps melting and my second answer was like permafrost melting or something… That was the first time I ever saw a question do a) through f) without any subpoint.</p>
<p>Above poster-</p>
<p>I said glacier melting, and thermal expansion of the oceans.</p>
<p>Overall, I thought that it was relatively easy, and fair.</p>
<p>zebra mussels was medium hard, i couldn’t remember another invasive specie.</p>
<p>If I got 75% of the FRQ and about 60 MC (including the guessing pentalty - about 30 wrong), what would I get?</p>
<p>^that sounds like a 5 to me :)</p>
<p>idk i thought MC was easy and that the free response wasn’t that bad either</p>
<p>Finally! After six months of studying, reviewing, and two days of cramming, that stupid test is done and overwith! I thought the MC was moderately difficult (I’m thinkin a 65) and the Written was… medium? I’m gonna guess a 20. It’s just such a relief to be able to think about something other than Nutrient Cycles and Environmental Law for sixty seconds.</p>
<p>For the part of the invasive species question talking about using invasive species for invasive species, I used the example of that old kids’ book, Woman who Swallowed a Fly… is that OK?</p>
<p>Waitttt 30 wrong on MC and only 75% on FRQ would be a 5?!</p>
<p>@ Tristan101
Yeah, it should be. Assuming you missed all 30 (70-7.5=62.5<em>.9=56.25) and got 75% of the FRQ right (60</em>.75 = 45), you would have a raw score of about 101.25. I think you need about a 91 for a 5.</p>
<p>Thanks, RtT. That’s good…considering I walked out of there thinking it was a 3 haha. In that case, I think it should have been a 5 ;)</p>
<p>Hey, can someone please post the score ranges? all i know FOR SURE is that </p>
<p>91+ points = 5
? = 4</p>
<p>aced it it the face!</p>
<p>super easy, loving my teacher for a three-day marathon of watching a movie about the invasive species- “Cane Toads”</p>