<p>UR is somewhat consciously apolitical. The school paper, for example, decided it would not allow debates over hot button issues like Palestine because those would create a negative climate on campus. There are, of course, politically-oriented clubs but much more energy is put into things like sustainability that can be embraced by a larger group. </p>
<p>I’ve noted many times that the Rochester Curriculum is undersold. We focus on the relative freedom it gives students: clusters instead of distribution reqs so you take classes that appeal to you. We miss the others side of the coin, that professors like it because they teach classes with kids who want to be there. This is not to say all classes are well taught; that isn’t true anywhere. But in general the people teaching want to teach and the people in the classes are choosing to be there. That is good.</p>
<p>And I like to note that UR is a place full of normal intelligent kids. They act normal. They dress normal. They have normal interests. I think that’s great. I think this is helped by the size of the school: large enough to have a wide variety of clubs and groups, small enough that people aren’t intimidated into not-joining. In fact, from what I see, UR is one of the more active schools, but in terms of interests not politics.</p>