@CourtneyThurston Good stuff. I happen to be in CS as well, and have done extremely well. I went to a school that Niche ranks a B- ⌠and honestly thatâs because it has a nice campus, greek and party life. Academically, it was lower than my high school. I decided to craft my own Comp Sci major there. Big fish, small pond. I was mentoring other students, working on building an online game (this was the 90s). When I came out of college, CS people were very hard to find, let alone able to communicate well, so I never had a challlenge.
College selection matters more for certain majors. For CS, I am not sure if I went to the same school today that I originally went to, that it would work as well. The field is far more competitive now, and flush with graduates. There are also many people like me who can evaluate candidates (back when I got out, no one could even evaluate us at companies as they had no experts). Having said that, I could interview a kid from a C school that seems to know her stuff, and choose her over a kid from an elite school that struggles with her stuff in an interview.
There are other majors where I think the name of the college may be more helpful. A huge part will always be the ambition of the kid (applying for internships, finding research work, job hunting).
One thing I have noticed, is that for my DD, a number of the more affordable schools donât even offer the major or minor options she is interested in. As an example, hands-on agricultural or environmental science is not common at many schools. Sure, they have a liberal-arts version of env studies, where you learn that toxic waste in the rivers is bad, and that solar power is good, but itâs not the same as working hands on in the large greenhouses, labs and internships available at the better schools.
But overall I agree with your point. I was an example of your point, especially for CS (itâs different for medical school, law, and so forth).
Although this topic is digressing a bit from the 3rd party scholarship banter