a letter to mr bollinger

<p>A letter to Mr. Lee Bollinger
Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:53:52 </p>

<p>M. J. A. Larijani, President OF THE Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics (IPM)<br>
Mr. Lee Bollinger </p>

<p>The President of Columbia University </p>

<p>Dear Sir, </p>

<p>I wish to register my deepest regret in regard to your remarkably discourteous introductory remarks to President Ahmadinejad. Your class act as an arbiter at the University of Columbia was nothing short of disgrace. It lacked professionalism especially given the fact that Mr. Ahmadinejad had not even been given the chance to speak. And it clearly undermined your repeatedly made claim that the event upheld free speech. Fortunately, this age, despite all its cruelty and barbarity, is an age of transparency, which is why not even liberals can hide themselves behind their usual covers these days. </p>

<p>What happened yesterday merely displayed utter conceit and petty politics showing who it was that really lacked civility. Trying to humiliate an invited guest, an elected President of a sovereign country, before an international media only reflects the culture of an insular and bigoted society. One wonders if your reaction had anything to do with donors threatening to withdraw funds from Columbia. It is incredulous that a respected American university chose to turn this meeting into a show trial of Iranian policies. So much for academic integrity and intellectual honesty. </p>

<p>Your crass, ill-mannered and duplicitous greeting of President Ahmadinejad amounted to a crude planned ambush. It is just unbelievable that someone who is simply questioning elements of the US foreign policy and refuses to be a US client should be submitted to such a systematic harassment. </p>

<p>If anybody wanted any proof that Israeli lobby controls US foreign policy, media, academic, etc., he has found plenty of evidence today. It has been noted that the protests against Iran at the UN and at Columbia were primarily made up of Israeli advocacy groups. Obviously, there is nothing wrong with that, but it highlights, among other things, AIPAC's influence not only on US foreign policy but also in the mainstream academia. </p>

<p>One could be forgiven for thinking that what happened yesterday at Columbia University represents the typical mindset of the present American ruling elite: delusionally arrogant, insolent and insensitive to the rest of the world. A sad spectacle since they have become so politically isolated that they are even incapable of learning from their past experiences. </p>

<p>It is extremely dishonest and manipulative to call into question the Iranian President's integrity when in reality it is the USA that is responsible for the misery and death of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and total destruction of their country. America is the same country that installed a medieval Shah with its secret SAVAK police after removing the democratically government of Dr Mosaddeq which in turn led to the hundreds of thousands of Iranians being killed and tortured by an Israeli trained police force. Ever since its inception, the Islamic Republic of Iran has been subject to countless destabilizing attempts by the US. But it has thwarted them all. The 8-year old war with Iraq, when all Western countries were helping their then good old chum Saddam, failed to bring this country to its knees. We do not think that the current drive towards waging a new war on Iran will stand a better chance of success. </p>

<p>In any case, yesterday was an opportunity to show the world that the USA is an open country that will challenge its opponents with appropriate compassion and honest debate. Instead, your decision to gather all Zionist-manufacture d anti-Iranian appellations, pile them up on the stage, and throw them shamelessly at your invited guest, will become the black page of ignominy in Columbia University's history. </p>

<p>With regards, </p>

<p>M. J. A. Larijani
President
Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics (IPM)</p>

<p>Just to clarify, I am not pro Iranian or anything in that sense; I just intitally felt it was wrong for him to be there before being convinced due to the foundations of America and freedom of speech. I was forwarding some of these articles which I thought were atleast interesting to read another perspective. I dont necesserily agree, just thought it was an interesting read and wanted to see some reactions. -greg</p>

<p>Please see my post, #4, in the OTHER thread you started about this exact same thing.</p>

<p>
[quote]
Fortunately, this age, despite all its cruelty and barbarity, is an age of transparency, which is why **not even liberals **can hide themselves behind **their usual covers **these days.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>well, at least he made his biases re: the political spectrum clear in the first paragraph. saved me a lot of effort in taking him seriously. Oh wait, we get more:</p>

<p>
[quote]
Your crass, ill-mannered and duplicitous greeting of President Ahmadinejad amounted to a crude planned ambush.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>That "ambush" was advertised beforehand as part of the invitation. Bollinger made this clear in his letter to the Columbia community prior to the event (linked in the other thread), and in his remarks on NPR following the event. Ahmadinejad knew that the price of accepting the invitation was hostile opening remarks. He accepted anyway, listened politely, made a quick comment about it at the very start of his speech, and then proceeded as normal. This was an ambush?</p>

<p>...and then, the Trifecta:</p>

<p>
[quote]
If anybody wanted any proof that Israeli lobby controls US foreign policy, media, academic, etc., he has found plenty of evidence today. It has been noted that the protests against Iran at the UN and at Columbia were primarily made up of Israeli advocacy groups. Obviously, there is nothing wrong with that, but it highlights, among other things, AIPAC's influence not only on US foreign policy but also in the mainstream academia.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Great. Yeah, the Jews, they're coming for all of us. Hide the children.</p>

<p>Seriously, do you even listen to yourself? An event at a nonprofit academic institution is somehow a front for a foreign-policy political agenda? And you're concluding this on the basis of some critical remarks made by the host, who wasn't even moderating the event? Seriously, AIPAC?</p>

<p>edit: I fear fanatics of all types.</p>

<p>
[quote]
An event at a nonprofit academic institution is somehow a front for a foreign-policy political agenda?

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Yes, it is. And that should not come as news to you. It is because of it, that elite nonprofit academic institutions should think carefully about the potential repercussions of some of the events that they do sponsor. The target audience is far more than just the university students. I hope it is coming clearer by now...</p>

<p>yeah, it's becoming clearer that you're a nutjob. If you'd attended one of those elite nonprofit academic institutions for 4 years, you'd understand how this isn't even remotely approaching the truth.</p>

<p>But go on repeating what Bill O'Reilly tells you.</p>

<p>"University of Columbia"?</p>

<p>Is that a joke?</p>

<p>Wow, the world must be about to end. The LA Times, one of the most liberal newspapers in the country, came up with a headline that some people here believe illustrates the way Bill O'Reilly (a conservative) thinks:</p>

<p>"AHMADINEJAD WALKS AWAY WITH A WIN"</p>

<p>"Bollinger clearly had an American audience in mind when he denounced the Iranian leader to his face as a "cruel" and "petty dictator" and described his Holocaust denial as designed to "fool the illiterate and the ignorant." Bollinger's remarks may have taken him off the hook with his domestic critics, but when it came to the international media audience that really counted, Ahmadinejad already had carried the day. The invitation to speak at Columbia already had given him something totalitarian demagogues -- who are as image-conscious as Hollywood stars -- always crave: legitimacy. Bollinger's denunciation was icing on the cake, because the constituency the Iranian leader cares about is scattered across an Islamic world that values hospitality and its courtesies as core social virtues. To that audience, Bollinger looked stunningly ill-mannered; Ahmadinejad dignified and restrained."</p>

<p>The following is the link to the article.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment...lines-calendar%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.latimes.com/entertainment...lines-calendar&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>