A way to make chance threads better

<p>I like the idea that's been floating around. Predict accept/reject for people's listed schools, and we can collect data on who is more accurate in the long run. Those who reply without thinking will have their opinion mean less, and those who are better at predicting can be recognized for it. One point for a correct prediction, no points for a n incorrect prediction. A score would look like this, 14/18, if someone has correctly predicted 14 out of 18 decisions in all their responses. </p>

<p>That being said, lets start with me ;)</p>

<p>Sat superscore: 2300 ( math 760, reading 780, writing 760 )
Sat 2: math 2: 800, physics 730
GPA 4.0
AP: bio, calc ab, physics b, euro, us history, psych, all 5, physics c mechanics, 4</p>

<p>Extracurriculars:</p>

<p>4 years varsity tennis and Xc
4 years matching band, elected band vp and pres, section leader two years
2 years choir
Independent studies in psych and physics c
Two college courses, one in engineering, one in enviro studies at top 20 lac
4 years musical, lead junior and senior year
Internship at college observatory</p>

<p>White male, central pa, 80k a year</p>

<p>Essays were good but who knows, recs we're good I hope plus an additional one from college professor I worked with at the observatory</p>

<p>Here's my list:</p>

<p>Princeton scea
Williams
Dartmouth</p>