<p>madville, I'm coming in late to this thread, but would like to add some comments. </p>
<p>First, I’m not clear on your financial situation. Will your family qualify for need based aid? If yes, then your son’s list can be as wide as you like. If, on the other hand, he will require MERIT aid, then you’ll need narrow that list down NOW to schools that offer it.</p>
<p>Second, I agree that your son will be a person of interest to all U.S. colleges. Of course this doesn’t mean guaranteed acceptance but there’s nothing in his background that would keep him out of the most selective colleges, and plenty that would get him IN. He should be concentrating on what he wants, not on where he would get accepted. Have a good safety or two and go for the gold. </p>
<p>This is doubly true for the more remotely located LACs like Bowdoin, Middlebury, Grinnell, Hamilton and even those that are the most selective like Amherst and Williams. These schools are competing for bright accomplished URMs like your son and it’s a buyers market.</p>
<p>Third, FIT is everything – social, academic, geographical, political, etc, etc. I went to Michigan a mega-sized (but academically excellent university) and didn’t fit. I had a so-so experience. My son went to a small LAC, Williams, and had an off the charts good experience. From this the last thing I want to do is generalize. On the contrary personalize! Your son needs to find the fit that’s best for him.</p>
<p>Over a four year career you take 32- 40 classes, 24-30 if you spend junior year abroad. If you have wide interests, about a half will be in your major, so unless you’re going for an obscure field (The culture and language of Tonga) or are already at a graduate level in Math or Physics, you won't run out of stimulus, even at a small school.</p>
<p>That was certainly my son’s experience. He could have filled up his course schedule for another 4 years or even 8! and still not take all the fascinating and challenging courses that his LAC offered, both in his majors and in unrelated electives. </p>
<p>We live in Indonesia, a country that few Americans know much about and few colleges recognize as being influential or important on the world stage. My son was amazed at the depth of experience among the faculty at his LAC: several were experts in the culture, language and politics of our host country and they went out of their way to meet with my son to discuss his life experience as an expat. Similarly, the more academically “popular” countries like China, Japan or India offered wide and deep choice of courses offerings, even at this small LAC.</p>
<p>I’m a fan of seeking UP to the college with the most intellectually challenging environment you can get into. Many smart highschoolers think they are ready for graduate school level courses, but get a shocking wakeup call when their first year papers are roundly criticized. (There are a couple of threads to this effect going on right now.) If you choose a college that is academically rigorous you will be swept along by the intellectual maelstrom; if you choose a college where you are the biggest intellectual fish, you may outgrow the pond.</p>
<p>I the real issue here is not the size of the course catalog but the intellectual rigor. Some colleges just demand more of their students than others – this goes for large universities and small LACs and I think the continued CHALLENGE is what keeps kids engaged for four years.</p>