<p>Pamela Lauzau, 63, put three children through Boston College and took a $400,000 second mortgage on her house in Alexandria, Virginia, to do so, which funded about two-thirds of the cost. The family didn’t receive financial aid.</p>
<h1>With her husband unable to work because he has dementia, she took a job as a school bus driver for the health insurance and sells real estate. Her youngest child graduated in May.</h1>
<h1>The story of the woman who took out $400,000 in loans to send her 3 children to BC is very sad. Her husband is disabled by dementia, and they have had to sell their home to pay back those loans. BC could have offered some financial assistance to this family who paid to send 3(!) kids to their school. </h1>
<p>I know it sounds harsh, but someone who knew she’d be 63 years old when her last child graduated had NO BUSINESS borrowing that much to give her children a luxury education. </p>
<p>People have to “do the math” and determine whether they will likely be a in a position to pay back those debts. If she’s 63, then likely her H is of a similar or older age. It’s a gamble to assume that we’ll get to that age without any health issues which would interfere with working and paying back huge debts.</p>
<p>It’s not the school’s fault that this family had the income not to qualify for aid, and chose to borrow to cover 2/3 of their EFC. Either this woman has a high income or the H’s dementia is a rather new thing. </p>
<p>The monthly payments must be about $5k per month! What must her/their income have been to think that was ok???</p>
<p>for them not to qualify for ANY aid, means that they have a high income. They chose to borrow. </p>
<p>A school shouldn’t have to give aid just because a family will borrow to cover its EFC and end up like this. This isn’t a NYU situation where low-income families take out loans because they didn’t get much aid even tho they qualified for lots of aid.</p>