<p>Recently, I've been surfing through this site and I've noticed that many people are confused as to how ACT scores are used in comparison to SAT scores. I know that colleges take the best scores on the SAT, as shown in the example below:</p>
<p>First Attempt: 800 M, 670 V, 650 W ---- [2120]
Second Attempt: 750 M, 700 V, 700 W ---- [2150]</p>
<p>In this case, a college would compute the test taker's overall score to be a 2200 [800 + 700 + 700]. This would yield a higher overall score than either of the composites previously generated.</p>
<p>However, I, along with many other people, am unsure as to whether colleges do the same with the ACT subscores. Consider the situation below:</p>
<p>First Attempt: English 32, Math 31, Reading 28, Science 25 ---- [29]
Second Attempt: English 30, Math 33, Reading 24, Science 30 ---- [29]</p>
<p>As you can see, the scores depicted here are vastly different, but both compute to a composite of 29. Will most colleges take the same process to add up subscores of the ACT like they do for the SAT?</p>
<p>For instance, let's take the best scores from each test:</p>
<p>English 32, Math 33, Reading 28, Science 30 [31]</p>
<p>Now that the best subscores have been combined, the new composite is a 31.</p>
<p>So far, I only know of one college that engages in this process (Washington University in St. Louis). I'm wondering if any other schools (especially the Northeastern schools) use this process also. I have already taken the ACT twice, and though my composite has remained the same during both sittings, I improved on three sections overall during the second testing, and ran out of time for one section (which caused it to plummet dramatically, and destroyed what could have been a fantastic composite).</p>
<p>I would appreciate if anyone has any info on this. I've seen it vaguely asked in some of the college forums here, but no one has provided an absolute answer.</p>