Activity sheet years confused!

<p>I sent my application already so I don't think I can change this anymore. But I'm international student so I do not know what the procedure is for Americans. For my activity list, I grouped my activities together (like community service, music: instrumental, dance, etc.).</p>

<p>But in each of those titles, I have 2 or more clubs involved. Like for community service, I tutor (9-11) and I also do soup kitchen (11-12); for music I play both a native instrument (9-10) and guitar (11-12); for dance I do native dance (11-12) and ballet (9-12).</p>

<p>Then in activity sheet I checked 9-12 for those activities because I was involved in some service/music/dance each year. In the boxes, I wrote those and the positions I held and some awards (but I did not place 9-12, etc. because they can not fit). And then I attached the full list of what I was involved in (like the name of the club etc.) and some explanations. These include everything I did entire high school, so example my service works take up more than half a page (they are bulleted). But in those I did not put the year levels when I worked on those either. Was I supposed to?</p>

<p>My teacher said I just have to put the names or nature of the work, explain a bit, indicate positions. If I became president after being secretary, I just list president (so I put the highest position I got). Please help!!!!!</p>

<p>bump…please??</p>

<p>Hi. I see that your other thread in another forum had been answered, but I think that you’re supposed to list the activities out one by one. So for example, (If I understand correctly), your list of activities should be:</p>

<p>Peer Tutoring
Position
Years: 9, 10, 11
Hours/Weeks…:</p>

<p>Soup Kitchen
Position
Years: 11, 12
Hours/Weeks…:</p>

<p>Joining them together creates a mess and as you are supposed to list them in order of importance, it would be a problem if you find one community service act affects you more than another. Best of luck though!</p>

<p>It’s fine, it won’t mean anything in your evaluation I’m sure.</p>