<p>This question has been debated extensively on CC’s LD board, and you might want to do a search, going back a few years, for the relevant threads. There are some pretty passionate opinions on both sides ranging from, Let’s reveal all; if the school doesn’t want my kid just as he is, !@#$ 'em (a bit of hyperbole, but you get the idea) to my polar opposite opinion, which is, Reveal nothing unless revealing something makes the applicant seem more desirable. </p>
<p>An example of the latter would be if a student was undiagnosed and unaccommodated through 10th grade, at which point testing, counseling in how to address the LD, and maybe accommodations or meds resulted in the kid’s grades rising significantly. Explaining what happened (or maybe giving the GC permission to explain what happened in the best light possible) could help the admissions folks understand why the kid’s GPA is depressed by lackluster 9th and 10th grade marks.</p>
<p>When you’ve got an LD kid whose grades and standardized test scores correctly reflect his academic abilities and accurately predict how well he will do in a given college, I don’t see the value of revealing. The possibility of bias, risk-aversion, a desire not to overload the LD support office, and fear of the unknown seem to me to be too great.</p>
<p>If the student has a well-documented LD, a 504 plan or equivalent private school plan that has been in place for years, and if retesting near the end of high school shows that the same LD’s persist and the same accommodations are needed, then the student should qualify for accommodations at the college level. Virtually every college in the US has a disabilities/support office (some a lot better than others) that facilitate LD students receiving the accommodations they need and to which they are entitled. Those offices are there because virtually every college in the US has LD students. </p>
<p>Those offices have no connection with admissions. LD students show up on their doorsteps in the fall with their medical documentation and the support offices take it from there. (If the family is smart, they have carefully checked it out to make sure the college their child selects is able to provide the specific support their student needs. A college without certain facilities may be a non-starter for some students.)</p>
<p>And really, with most LD students, accommodation is not that hard and not that big a deal for the school. Say a particular dyslexic student reads at the rate of a tortoise and cannot read handwriting so must write essays with a keyboard. The college gives the student extra time and/or Kurzweil in order to read the test, and allows the student to type answers on a keyboard. The student lets the support office know about the test and his midterm and final exam schedule in time for this to be set up. If the student needs books on tape or other assistive technology, the college steers him toward services that can provide them. Voila. </p>
<p>My kid’s LD was identified early with testing at the school’s suggestion. He was a superb student at a tough high school with appropriate accommodation and a lot of motivation, determination, and hard work. The decision about whether or not to reveal was his, and he felt that revealing would be asking the college to feel sorry for him and was way too private. (Note that the GC may not legally reveal without your permission.)</p>
<p>S was accepted to an excellent college where he is also a superb student. After he got into the college, he revealed both to the college’s support office and to the administrator of the program that had accepted him. Neither seemed to have any feeling that he should have told them beforehand. The college offered him more support than was available at his high school, but he ended up using exactly the same plan that he did in hs and not availing himself of other services that were offered. </p>
<p>Would he have been accepted into his top choice college if he’d revealed during the admissions process, maybe with a couple of paragraphs about overcoming obstacles etc.? Who knows. But the decision not to reveal certainly didn’t have a downside for him, and no one held that decision against him when matriculated.</p>