Admissions Rates for Class of 2012

<p>Does anyone expect to get into college with these acceptance rates?</p>

<p>Amherst
14.2% (overall)
Bowdoin
18.4% (overall)
Brown
13.3% (overall) 12.0% (regular) 22.7% (ed)
Chicago
27.9 % (overall)
Claremont Mckenna
19.12% (overall)
Columbia
10.0% (overall) 8.4% (regular) 23.1% (ed)
Cornell
20.4% (overall) 18.7% (regular) 36.8% (ed)
Dartmouth
13.2% (overall) 11.8% (regular) 28.0% (ed)
Duke
18.75% (overall)
Emory
25.8% (overall)
Georgetown
18.0% (overall)
Johns Hopkins
21.6% (overall)
Harvard
7.1% (overall)
Middlebury
18.5 % (overall)
Northwestern
25.3% (overall)
Notre Dame
24.5 % (overall)
Penn
16.4% (overall) 13.8% (regular) 29.2% (ed)
Princeton
9.3% (overall)
Swarthmore
14.9 % (overall)
Vanderbilt
23.7% (overall)
Williams
16.3% (overall)
Yale
8.3% (overall) 5.6% (regular) 18.1% (ed)</p>

<p>Where exactly did you get these? (Yale is SCEA by the way)</p>

<p>MIT
11.6% (overall), 10.9% (regular), 13.3% (EA), </p>

<p>Stanford
9.5% (overall), 8.3% (regular), 16.2% (SCEA), 13.3% (SCEA + QuestBridge round)</p>

<p>Amherst
14.2% (overall), 12.5 % (regular)</p>

<p>this is why I'm applying to so many reaches :(</p>

<p>^ Same here.</p>

<p>2012? So people who just finished senior highschool year? US News and your numbers are different... why is that..Johns Hopkins 21.6%.. US news says 27 %... that is a lot of difference</p>

<p>The U.S News 2009, coming out in about three weeks, will reflect admission rates for the Class of 2011.</p>

<p>The U.S. News coming out NEXT year will take THESE numbers into account. </p>

<p>It's always behind.</p>

<p>
[quote]
this is why I'm applying to so many reaches

[/quote]

[quote]
^ Same here.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Please, don't. You're the reason why the numbers are so low in the first place.</p>

<p>^^ amen. It's a vicious cycle.</p>

<p>FWIW, you are not statistically more likely to get into a reach school by applying to more reach schools. In order for that to be true, admissions would need to be a random event, and they are not.</p>

<p>Wow, those numbers are scary. But it's even scarier to think of how many colleges people will start applying to--when will people realize prestige isn't everything?</p>

<p>
[quote]
Please, don't. You're the reason why the numbers are so low in the first place.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Yes, I was just about to say the same thing.</p>

<p>Well, let's be honest; no one's going to think "hey, if I don't apply to all of these schools, I'll be able to help everyone else!" Of course people are going to apply to more schools... it's unfortunate but inevitable.</p>

<p>If you want to change it, you'll have to fix the system... somehow.</p>

<p>EDIT: I agree 100% with Hiyo</p>

<p>@ kyledavid: I think admissions are enough of a random event to warrant applying to more schools. Just look at the results for people who apply to the ivies...</p>

<p>Ultimately, college admissions is a selfish game in which every advantage counts , and that includes applying to more schools. If someone is in the ballpark for Harvard, it would be plain stupid for them to apply only to Harvard. If they apply to both Princeton and Harvard they have a better chance at going to a top school. </p>

<p>Anyways, I see nothing wrong with applying to more than a couple schools. The better people will get in anyways, and as long as they responsibly manage their acceptances (by deciding quickly so that waitlisted people are notified as soon as possible) then I don't see any detrimental effects occurring. Also, I think that the low admissions rates are also affected a lot by other factors than people applying to more schools.</p>

<p>Washington and Lee 968/ 6385 = 15.16%</p>

<p>acceptance rate doesn't work like that 1putt59, you need to take into account yield. I guarantee that Washington and Lee has a lot higher acceptance rate than that, if you do that with Wash U they have 6% (obviously wrong)</p>

<p>Colgate 23.9%</p>

<p>wow. UChicago was for a long time at 40%, but in the past couple of years it's gone down to 38%, to 35%, and now this. Ridiculous.</p>

<p>Bescraze:</p>

<p>I beg to differ. I am a W&L alum, and received the following e-mail from the school:</p>

<p>"Dean of Admissions William Hartog knew this year was going to be one for the record books long before the January 15th application deadline. “The advent of our new Johnson Scholarship Program brought a great deal of positive attention to W&L this year, and that translated into the largest applicant pool in the University’s history,” he said. </p>

<p>The admission staff recently completed its review of the 6,385 applications submitted for the Class of 2012, representing all 50 states, the District of Columbia, the territories of Guam, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, and 84 foreign countries. Only 968 students were offered admission to the 455-member class of first year students, for an admission rate of 15%. “This group of accepted students is the strongest ever admitted to W&L, by any measurable standard,” Hartog said."</p>

<p>uchicago was always self-selective. i remember only the genius kids at my highschool applying to uchicago. are things changing?</p>

<p>The earliest you can get final, authoritative numbers is in JANUARY for the class of high school students who entered the previous fall. Many colleges have "summer melt" (that is, some admitted students decide not to attend) and have to go to their waiting lists to fill their classes. So in January 2009, you will be able to get Common Data Set figures in various places online (I usually use the College Board website) for members of high school class of 2008 (college class of 2012). Those will APPROXIMATELY match, with some trends up or down, what you face now as a member of (I'm guessing) high school class of 2009 applying for college class of 2013. The figures available today (August 2008) that are comparable from one college to another are figures for high school class of 2007.</p>