<p>Hi everyone,</p>
<p>So I'm a rising senior focused on applying to the LACs. </p>
<p>Brief Background: I go to a highly competitive high school where I've got a 3.65 UW GPA, a 2340, 5's on AP French, Spanish, Lit, and APUSH and 3 760+ SAT IIs. I'm also hugely involved in my school community through many different clubs and committees w/ lots of leadership positions. I've done some solid ECs outside of school as well. </p>
<p>Here's the issue.
In a recent decision with my college counselor, he said this: </p>
<p>"While you've got a good shot at getting in to Middlebury or Bowdoin, I would say that Williams and Swarthmore are only marginally feasible." </p>
<p>I appreciate that my GPA isn't stellar and that I don't necessarily merit admission at these schools, but I am curious about the distinctions within the four (and beyond, really).</p>
<p>Admit Rates for the class of 2017 at these colleges were as follows: </p>
<p>Middlebury: 18 %
Williams: 17 %
Bowdoin:16%
Swarthmore: 14 %</p>
<p>So how does Bowdoin become a low/mid. reach when Williams, which has a higher admit rate, is apparently nearly unattainable? Does the 1% separating Williams and Midd. make a real difference? And does Swarthmore really pull away from the pack in terms of selectivity? </p>
<p>This 14%-18% seems relatively arbitrary to me, along with the modern-day distinction between Amherst, Swarthmore and Williams vs. Some of the other NESCACs. </p>
<p>Anyone able to shed some light on the nuances here?</p>