<p>Perhaps I should have asked what makes a “good” officer.</p>
<p>My single biggest disappointment about the Academy has been teh attitude of many of those who attend. Many are not prepared, mentally or physically, to be here. Phsyical deficiencies I will leave to another day.
Mentally, however, it seems that more than a few consider the whole “leadershp laboratory” concept to be a game. That the multitude of regs. are just there to be gamed.</p>
<p>In that regard, you are correct. People get a degree from here, they get to be called “sir.”</p>
<p>Simply put, you don’t drink as a plebe because its againt the rules. You don’t drink when underaged because its against the law and against the rule. YOu don’t overdrink, even when of age, because its against the rules. And if you can’t follow the rules, how can or should you expect for your subordinates to follow the rules. Whether I agree or disagree with the rule doesn’t matter.</p>
<p>I believe an officer should do what’s right because its the right thing to do. He/She has the moral bearing to do the right thing, not because he is afraid of being caught but because he has been trained to do the right thing at all times. Perhaps that is wha tyou will learn to be the difference between an enlisted person and an officer.
The “degree” certainly entitles you to be called “sir” and grants you those bars. Technically you are an officer.</p>
<p>Perhaps the question is more one of the difference between an officer and a leader.</p>
<p>I can tell you that here, at the Academy, I have not heard anybody, w/ a “wink and a nod”, imply to those who are not permitted to drink that, since they were going to do it anyway, they should “be careful.” Quite the contrary, all I have been remined of is that those who are underage should [must] not drink. That the punishment can be severe. “Don’t do it” has been the mantra.</p>
<p>And I can give you a couple of examples where underage drinking was punished. Even though everybody was careful and nobody was harmed. A little ol’ party in a rented house where a few plebes showed up; big trouble for everybody concerned because the upper-class in attendance did not immediately send those guys home.
Drugs? Slightly different issue but still relevant. How about separation for drug use that occurred over the summer but was still detectable. No harm, no foul?</p>
<p>No trap. Very easy. You tell everybody to tell the truth. </p>
<p>Good luck. Perhaps your perspective will change at the “leadership laboratory.” Maybe not.</p>