<p>sean123- I'm not saying guys are faster or better!</p>
<p>In my opinion the best girls are faster then the best guys!</p>
<p>I'll say I was decent.</p>
<p>arent you going into your jr year ?</p>
<p>umm that's not really an opinion thing, it's a fact that the fastest guys are faster than the fastest girls.</p>
<p>unwritten are you saying your slower then somebodynew</p>
<p>Neither of us are claiming to be the fastest guy or girl, so no she isn't. (But our times do say I'm faster.)</p>
<p>hmmmmm.. that's my opinion so it is an opinion!</p>
<p>is it possible for me to be better then you if i run a 1/16 of a mile
i remember my scores for gym but they werent the best and this accounts for a mile</p>
<p>oy vey. i'm saying that IN GENERAL (not specifically me, not specifically somebodynew or whoever), the fastest guy runners are faster than the fastest girl runners because of biological differences etc. the fastest guys in the world have better times than the fastest girls in the world so i dont see how you can have the "opinion" that the girls are faster than guys, because obviously they just aren't. that is why guys and girls race separately</p>
<p>it took be i think like 5 minutes or 6 minutes and 45 seconds</p>
<p>
[quote]
oy vey.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>My thoughts exactly thoughout this entire thread.</p>
<p>
[quote]
it took be i think like 5 minutes or 6 minutes and 45 seconds
[/quote]
</p>
<p>If that's your mile time, and you really are a 9th grader--then hot damn, you've got nothing to worry about. If that's your 1/16th of a mile (100m--who in the world says 1/16th of a mile) time, then you've got other problems.</p>
<p>in middle school during gym class it had taken me 6 minutes and 45 seconds to get around the whole entire track, i had got a cramp a 1/16 way though, eventhough im short can i still be a good runner? im really curious about that</p>
<p>hahaha no offense but if that's your 100m time i hope you were like walking.. with a broken leg</p>
<p>if that's your mile time then first of all is it 5 min or 6 min? there's a huge difference</p>
<p>i think it wasnt a mile though...... it was one lap and thats one 1/2 a mile?</p>
<p>
[quote]
in middle school during gym class it had taken me 6 minutes and 45 seconds to get around the whole entire track, i had got a cramp a 1/16 way though, eventhough im short can i still be a good runner? im really curious about that
[/quote]
</p>
<p>6 minutes and 45 seconds to run/walk a 400? One lap is 1/4 a mile.</p>
<p>Short people can be good runners. There was a kid on our team who was like 5'1" as a freshman and was the best freshman on the team (came in 3rd in the 15 and under conference championships).</p>
<p>it was 6 minutes it may have been a whole mile</p>
<p>i only ran once around so your prabably right it was only 1/4</p>
<p>im taller then him im 5'8 , there were some really short people in my middle school and there were some really short people like over 6 feet, i was like in the middle i think and is that time for one lap really good</p>
<p>I'll be brutally honest--that is pretty bad. Ok, maybe not brutally honest.</p>
<p>i meant tall people!!! not short people !!!!! a short person isnt over 6 foot lol</p>