<p>Even after all the cases of abusive law schools (UT Law advising graduates to become paralegals, Emory's graduation speech, etc.), I am still considering perhaps attending law school in the future.</p>
<p>Age:
If I do, should I do it straight out of unviersity? If I complete the full four-years (right now, I have the choice between Emory, University of Edinburgh, UT-Austin, and Tufts), I will still have graduated by the age of 19.</p>
<p>Similar to undergraduate admissions, age, in its generality, is in most cases taken as a mark of maturity (or immaturity) and I don't expect any different from law schools. From what I have heard and read so far regarding law school admissions, am I safe to say the my only bet, and a risky one at that, would be the arbitrary Yale Law?</p>
<p>Under the assumptions that age does put one at disadvantage as a law school applicant, would it be advisable to complete a master's degree before applying to law schools (I am planning on a LSE master's degree some time in the future)?</p>
<p>Location:
Another thing is, if I accept my undergraduate offer from Edinburgh, or if I decide to complete my Master's at LSE before applying to law schools, would that play a part in the decision-making? If so, would it stand as a pro or a con?</p>