<p>The more i think about it, it seems as though its impossible for the college board to discover exactly how hard a test was or exactly who was taking it on tests. This curve thing seems to be more of a PR thing(our tests are fairly equated!), although it may be slightly applicable on the SAT 1, where the margin for error on each section is very small and slight changes in difficulty do matter. But on subject tests the deviation of a point of two from the normal curve is just pr, same with ap exams.</p>
<p>Has the Math Level 2 curve ever been above 44/50?</p>
<p>I'm not sure how they even determine a curve...I mean, could it just be that a lot of people taking it now were seniors who had either taken it before or are in much more difficult math classes (possibly having taken AP Calc)...I'm just hoping a 44 raw score is an 800, right now I have myself at 45 :/ based on the answers that have been posted on here.</p>
<p>I'm hovering at 45 also. I wish that I bombed so that I could just cancel and live in peace lol.</p>
<p>haha i'm also hovering at a 45 (prays that all other answers were correct). man i really hope we get a good curve :/</p>
<p>"btw, with 17 omitted and 3-4 wrong, you'll get a 600, and whether the curve is favorable to us or not, it could push it either way. I got the score approximation from the princeton review prep book--it comes with a conversion table for math IC and IIC"</p>
<p>I have the same book and sparknotes has the same exact curve:
<a href="http://www.sparknotes.com/testprep/books/sat2/math2c/chapter2section4.rhtml%5B/url%5D">http://www.sparknotes.com/testprep/books/sat2/math2c/chapter2section4.rhtml</a></p>
<p>Are you reading it right? I see around a high 600's rather than a 600.</p>