<p>Okay I guess I am back. </p>
<p>Grinnell’s financial aid for internationals is great, but need-aware. They might put you on the waitlist or not accept you at all if you need a lot of financial aid and they already have used up their money. That being said, this is still better than the old system, under which Grinnell had need-blind admissions for internationals, but committed to meeting a maximum of half the cost of attendance (or perhaps half of demonstrated need, not sure). However I should also mention that one thing that is considered is rather than getting rid of need-blind admissions altogether is to admit more internationals, as there is usually enough international applicants that can pay in full. As an international student who is on a significant amount of financial aid this implies to me that international perspectives are valued only as long as they can pay for their own. I am aware that Grinnell’s responsibility is to primary educate domestic students and I support that, however assuming that internationals can pay in full is problematic on more than one level. </p>
<p>Unfortunately I don’t have any numbers and I don’t think those numbers will be available any time soon. I just think that of all the changes and statements made by Raynard Kington the statements concerning financial aid are perhaps the most worrisome. </p>
<p>Grinnell is still need-blind but from what I understand Grinnell has started to hold its recruiting events in wealthier areas. I am unsure whether this is a new development however. </p>
<p>Grinnell has a problem with alumni-giving to its endowment so the financial concerns are definitely legitimate, however I also think that the college is missing an even more important part: If Grinnell changes it financial-aid policy to need-aware even more alumni will be unwilling to donate. I know I will. Also like I said, the fact that there is money for sending the HWCs to Denmark but not for financial aid seems like hypocrisy to me.</p>