<p>Hi blindmonkey!</p>
<p>Well, wouldn’t those two industries hire Econ or Bus Ad majors … or Math … or some major offered at Cal Poly? If Cal Poly students have the training but aren’t being considered because those companies choose to only hire from Cal, then I don’t think that gives Cal an advantage.</p>
<p>However, I agree that if those industries tend to hire from Cal-only majors (Classics, Near Eastern Studies, Scandinavian, Slavic Languages and Literature, Social Welfare, Religious Studies, Geography, …), then Cal has an edge because my assumption was that those majors have starting salaries below the average. </p>
<p>In looking through the majors for both schools, I noticed that Cal Poly has a lot of agriculture majors which Cal doesn’t. That might balance things out a bit. Which is why I think considering common majors is the only fair way to compare schools. </p>
<p>Another factor is size. If Cal Poly places 90% of the Mechanical Engineers each year and their graduating class is 150, and if Cal places x% of their ME’s but their graduating class is (I have no clue, but it’s bigger … is it double? triple?) … well, you get my point. </p>
<p>I wonder if the dropout rate is the same for both schools. I suspect Cal Poly gets a higher percentage of students through the program, but maybe not. </p>
<p>But I think vballmom summed it up perfectly: "If you intend to go on for a PhD, then again I’d recommend a UC over Cal Poly. Your chances at grad school admission will be enhanced by the in-depth theory you’d get at at UC; without that, you’d be competing for admission to grad school against students who have the depth that you won’t get at Cal Poly.</p>
<p>If your plans are to stop with a BS or MS and then go directly to work, then Cal Poly will give you the best preparation."</p>