Any real difference in education?

<p>

</p>

<p>I agree with lesdiables… it’s frankly a waste of resources if they got Chomsky to teach Intro Ling. Come on, you want someone reputable in their field to teach you for the education you’ve invested in but you don’t need the guy who is considered the flipping father of modern linguistics to teach an intro course which should not need to confer all the advanced concepts of the field. Getting a top scholar to teach an intro class would be more for the impressive looks you get when you say you’re taught by a Nobel laureate than actual results in educational quality. And as for “as if getting taught painting by Da Vinci” that may be more of a result of the expectations one has in attending a class taught by revered faculty. </p>

<p>

</p>

<p>No offense, but you got this from sitting in on your D’s class? How can you be so confident in describing this, if you weren’t the one experiencing the class firsthand and attending it every week as a brilliant student being exposed to the material for the first time?</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Math 55 happens to also be a very exclusive class that not just any Harvard freshman can enroll in. I think the final enrollment for Math 55 is something like 20 students with a great number having dropped out before completing the course. It shouldn’t be used as an example of the typical intro class at a HYPSM school.</p>