<p>So, Lagrange Error Bound is just the next term in the series?! Agh, it can't be that easy!</p>
<p>thats only for alternating series, for taylor's there's this weird formula for it....so if you write an integral expression in shell instead of washer tomorrow, is that still okay?</p>
<p>So your A/(x+a) + B/(x+b) has to be equal to your original equation, which would be something over (x^2+ax+bx+ab). So, you multiply through by the denominator, which is x^2+ax+bx+ab. Eventually this becomes:
A(x+b)+B(x+a)= original numerator
Let x= -b. Solve for B
Let x= -a Solve for A
After you find A and B, you plug them over their respective denominators, and if you integrate, you will get some Natural Log function. Hope this helped.</p>
<p>It's showtime. Good luck everyone. :)</p>
<p>OH MY GOSH.
did anyone else think that was a ridiculous test?????
FREE RESPONSE MURDERED ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
<p>Yep. I got a 1. >_<</p>
<p>I think I barely managed to get a 3.
unless my stupid mistakes come back to haunt me, and then I'll get a really high 2.
I totally made a calculator mistake in #1 and a mental math mistake in the last question.</p>
<p>i hope there's a HUGE curve! i only pray for a 3. glad to know i'm not the only one who thought the FR was just pure ridiculous >.<</p>
<p>I'm really, really hoping for a 3.</p>
<p>I think someone said that you had to get 36~/108 on the 2005 one to get a 3.
I think I got about 42-46ish, so I should have a 3.</p>
<p>Im thinking I got a grand total of...20.</p>
<p>Not even kidding.</p>
<p>i feel less alone..i just hope i crack at least total of 40 or something >.< maybe just maybe unless i made stupid careless mistakes on MC</p>
<p>omfg............. I am not gonna discuss the content but I totally misread the free response number one, two, and six.... spent an hour on those and didn't write anything after all... omfg...... omfg..... i will never get over this stupid test.... omfg.... world is coming to an end.... omfg....</p>
<p>yeah. free response was bad. Hoping for a big big big curve .... :/</p>
<p>
[quote]
omfg............. I am not gonna discuss the content but I totally misread the free response number one, two, and six.... spent an hour on those and didn't write anything after all... omfg...... omfg..... i will never get over this stupid test.... omfg.... world is coming to an end.... omfg....
[/quote]
</p>
<p>i totally misread number 1 too...i will say what i did at first when we're allowed to, but i spent like 20 mins doing it the other way due to misreading which turned out to be a BC topic, but then i realized i read it wrong and it was actually just ab...</p>
<p>i finally got it right though, but i wasted so much time!</p>
<p>I figured for all the massive BC guys that it was easy. I had to learn all the BC in a month and I thought it was hard, but most of the stuff I recognized, I just didn't know how to do it really. I doubt I passed, but I gave it my best. I needed a 4 anyways to get college credit. Best of luck to you all.</p>
<p>Does anyone else think that the time limits are stupid?
I didn't have enough time on the nocalc MC, but I could have taken a nap on the calc MC part.
They should really give you like 80 minutes for the nocalc MC section and 30 minutes for the calc MC part.</p>
<p>Oh come one, it wasn't that bad. Yea the FRQ were harder than the previous years, but if you truly understand the BC concepts, they were not too hard. The only tricky FRQ were probably #6 (and even that was not too hard). I probably lost a fair amount of credit due to lack of work/justification, but w/e.</p>
<p>I got a 0 on #6 . On the others though, I think I did o.k.</p>
<p>wait, the first question didnt involve BC stuff!!! S WORD!!!! what on earth? I thought i read it really clearly?!?!?!??!?!?! WAAHHH32.wad!</p>
<h1>6 was the easiest, didn't you guys learn that? Its a pretty important part of calc bc....</h1>