<p>a) Not sure what you mean by MR, marginal revenue is always diminishing I thought. Unless you mean the monopoly will receive profits… That would be because the price it charges is higher that the cost curve.</p>
<p>b) and c) as far as those, they’re about 10% of the test with w/ like 60 questions, so at most 10 for both of the combined.</p>
<p>A) Axiom: Well a monopolist is only going to operate where he is maximizing profit. When Demand is elastic an increase in output (decrease in price) will raise profit. Thus MR is positive. (And Monopolists will only operate in that area).</p>
<p>B) Probably one question on the MC: something like “if there is a negative externality, what can be said about the output and price of a good” or it’ll give you a scenario and ask if it is a negative or positive externality. </p>
<p>C) Again probably a question on the MC: “which of the following is a public good:” .</p>
<p>All this is based of my teacher and practice MCs, so “disclaimer”.</p>
<p>That was a lot easier than Macro, which was a heck of a surprise for me, I answered 52/60 on my first pass and then pretty much finished the test off.
FRQs were pretty easy too. :)</p>
<p>So much easier! And usually it’s harder than Macro. On Macro there were like 10 questions I wasn’t completely sure of and I missed an entire FR question. On Micro I pretty much knew everything and finished early on each.</p>
<p>Shizzle, I think it was the opposite for me. </p>
<p>FRQ 1 I aced.
I got FRQ 2 right then changed the answers and got (b) and (c) wrong (shifted wrong curve).
FRQ 3 was tricky, but I think I got em all.</p>
<p>Well, the last part of FRQ I completely BS’d. Like the very last subsection of it. I think I got it right, but it freaked me out when I first looked at it. Idk, 2 was the only one I had certainty on.</p>
<p>And I still don’t know what the answer to that last part of number 1 was. Other sections… eh okay.</p>
<p>Yeah, for macro 1 was a piece of cake, 2 was a piece of cake, and 3 was pretty easy.</p>
<p>(For me)</p>
<p>Micro, 1 was ooookay (though I think I got some subsections wrong), 2 was a disaster, and 3 was good, I guess.</p>
<p>MC, who knows?</p>
<p>I feel like the subject difficulty has a lot to do with which was covered first (if you’re taking the actual course). Macro concepts are hammered in, whereas Micro is a lot fuzzier.</p>
<p>I covered Micro first and thought it was an easier subject in general. Not that Macro is hard, but today it was a little scary. I think I was nervous and I had a stupid song stuck in my head the whole time. And, I was the only one taking it, so location of test was an issue, and it was loud. So by the afternoon I had moved to a quieter place. Of course, I also self studied Macro while having a teacher for Micro.</p>