Appalling

Well, now SPS’s attempts to force a reveal of the victim’s identity is moot, as she’s decided to go public herself. I imagine that it takes a lot of guts for a young woman to speak out about what happened to her, so good for her! http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2016/08/30/owen-labrie-victim-speaks-publicly-for-first-time/29TyjHzOs16mldjAbBIXHN/story.html

I saw that. So an attempt to make the family shut up about their child’s injury has catapulted the story to the front page. As of right now, a Google search turns up four pages of stories. The interview on Today was 7 minutes long.

So, the attempt to make the publicity go away backfired.

It seems like every school mishandles cases like this when they start circling the wagons. But the fact that current SPS parents helped pay for Labrie’s defense but did nothing for the victim makes me sick.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2016/08/25/prominent-paul-parent-helped-pay-for-accused-rapist-defense/jCp5G2Xls6tPqk21JK7qAO/story.html

@PetraMC what would you have them do for her? pay her?

I would expect current parents not to get involved at all.

I’m with you, @PetraMC. I was surprised about the reports of current parents contributing to the defense costs. The only way I would have been ok with that is if they’d raised the money, but then split it with half going to his defense costs and half going to a victim’s rights or rape awareness charity, or something of that sort. Otherwise it feels like they were choosing sides, against the victim.

I wonder if some of the parents who contributed to Laurie’s defense fund had boys in his class and were worried that if he were convicted it would make it more likely there would be further digging into the “Senior Salute” resulting in charges, or at least disapprobation, for their boys.

Good point, @Sue22. I would have to hope that the parents who gave, did so with no idea what Owen Labrie was really like (which was revealed by the transcripts of the texts/emails/FB posts he wrote). And I hope they were sickened by their own support when and if they followed the trial and discovered what he was like when he thought no one was looking.

Here is a comment an SPS parent posted to one of the Globe articles. I hope it helps put things in perspective:

@PetraMC yes I agree but you wrote “But the fact that current SPS parents helped pay for Labrie’s defense but did nothing for the victim makes me sick.”

@Center The optics would have been slightly less bad if they would have, I don’t know, offered to help pay for her mental health counseling? Something? Anything? But they should have stayed out of it completely.

Many of us have found ourselves in situations which we have later regretted.

I let someone walk me home in college when I was drunk, and was almost raped while passed out.

But I also moved in with a guy three days after my first date with him, and have a still running 30 year relationship from it.

The sad part is that we all have to take chances in life, and we don’t know where they will lead. The two situations were very similar, with a “gentleman” walking me home to my dorm room. How do you know the gentleman from the rapist when they are both Ivy League students?

@rhandco Very true. Personal reponsibility is also an important issue on the part of young women and young men. I think the young people at UVA and Duke that were falsely accused might have a different perpspective

I find it frustrating that, given the HUGE volume of sexual assault cases, some victim blaming poster always wants to trot out a story or two about false accusations. Studies have shown that false accusations are a minuscule percentage. It detracts from the discussion and the addressing of a legitimate issue to post that constant refrain rather that dealing with a serious, recurring problem.

a great many of these cases are not cut and dry. In most the young woman desperately wanted to be with the boy in question: things turned south mid rendevous. The rest is he said she said… The SPS “victim” engaged willingly per her own testimony…then according to her, own statement, couldn’t say no. Now that is appalling.

These situations should not be about not saying no. If there is silence, consent should NOT be assumed. If there is respect between the parties, there should be a clear “yes”.

In her testimony, the St. Paul’s victim stated under oath she said no. http://nymag.com/thecut/2015/08/where-the-st-pauls-school-rape-case-stands-now.html

There is a huge reluctance to believe victims; there are far more silent victims than those who step forward. Few accusers does not mean nothing happened. Yesterday the report about St. George’s came out. If posters want to discuss it in detail, please start a new thread.

Of interest to the current discussion, though, is the sheer scale of the incidents the investigator found in the alumni of the '70s and '80s:

http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2016/09/01/stgeorges/4so7ElWQwjTsnDkv5eI3NJ/story.html

If you recall, when the first St. George’s victims spoke up as adults last year, they also recounted how the school had made their accusations go away. One victim had given up, after the school’s attorneys played hardball:

https://www.bostonglobe.com/arts/2015/12/14/stgeorges/QBq1IfsItk6relwmPQJbRP/story.html

At the time, at St. George’s School, the actual tally of abuse victims at the hand of this one man was not one victim; it wasn’t four victims. It was almost 20% of all the female students. It is very sad the school put all its effort into making the scandal “go away.”

At St. Paul’s School, Owen Labrie deleted 119 of his online messages. Competitions are about racking up a score, aren’t they? Do you think there was only one case of statutory rape in this “Senior Salute?” I don’t, although I certainly understand if some victims and their families choose not to go through the public torture of a statutory rape trial.

I mostly read the St. George’s report and oh my! There are no excuses for what’s written in there but it was certainly a different time and I get that.

The St. Paul’s situation seems like the institution has made a wrong turn at every.single.juncture. If the school accepts any Federal $$ they must comply with Title IX and oh by the way, it’s the right thing to do! I know I’ve spent the summer educating my daughter on issues such as what happened there. I actually had her read all The Boston Globe articles on this case, including the comments so she gets a better idea about perceptions regarding the type of school she will soon attend.