<p>mcb52</p>
<p>Either you are biased, or have low standards.</p>
<p>I think he/she was joking.</p>
<p>Harvard
ugly</a> guy picture by onali67 - Photobucket</p>
<p>Stanford
<a href="http://www.calebdaniloff.com/whereirantoday/uploaded_images/bubble_boy_2-754379.jpg%5B/url%5D">http://www.calebdaniloff.com/whereirantoday/uploaded_images/bubble_boy_2-754379.jpg</a></p>
<p>^ Agreed.
10char</p>
<p>I'm willing to bet $10 that MIT guys get laid much much more often than Yale guys (not including gay sex).</p>
<p>^ I'll take that bet.</p>
<p>And even if it was close (which it obviously isn't), the quality of girls being laid would be infinitely higher at Yale.</p>
<p>Yeah no idea what you're talking about. I would say Yale definitely gets more action. Besides, even if you are excluding Yale gays, and we exclude the hideous MIT kids... Yale still wins.</p>
<p>owned</p>
<p>
[quote]
And even if it was close (which it obviously isn't), the quality of girls being laid would be infinitely higher at Yale.
[/quote]
I'd say the quality of "girls being laid" is better at MIT because 1) you got girls from all the Boston-area colleges there <plus mit="" guys="" basically="" have="" a="" monopoly="" on="" the="" wellesley="" chicks=""> and 2) MIT girls really dress up and all to compete with all these other girls</plus></p>
<p>Mal77, you've never been around the Boston-area on a weekend have you?</p>
<p>^ Dressing up doesn't change the fact that they're ugly. Sorry.</p>
<p>Also, Boston girls are sleeping with Harvard and BC guys, not MITes.</p>
<p>P.S. Wellesley girls are dykes.</p>
<p>^ they're sleeping with MIT guys over Harvard and BC guys... and the MIT chicks are really attractive (if they go to parties at other colleges, they outshine the homegirls)</p>
<p>and I think you could consider me a relatively unbiased judge of that since I'm not affiliated with MIT</p>
<p>edit: judging from the pictures of Yale's top 50 in the Rumpus, I'd say the MIT guys I've seen are significantly better-looking than a good deal of the Yale guys here</p>
<p>I don't think you prospective [male] Yalies should really be ****ed about that...Better odds for you guys, right?</p>
<p>Ok well we can only settle this with a Miss America- College edition.</p>
<p>Miss Yale, Miss Harvard, Miss MIT, Miss BC, Miss Wellesley</p>
<p>^ no judgement on how the guys compare?</p>
<p>If you hold a beauty pageant like that, you'll just be comparing the cream of the crop vs the cream of the crop elsewhere... doesn't really say much about the real composition of a college's students.</p>
<p>I think the difference in attractiveness is more noticeable among the guys though..</p>
<p>I was being sarcastic... but yeah.</p>
<p>Which school do you believe has the better men?</p>
<p>(before I get to Yale- then it's no question)</p>
<p>I'll add in our niece (sort out by abercrombie etc) who attended Brandeis met her fiance freshman year at MIT frat party. She and her friends all used to travel to the MIT parties on the weekends.</p>
<p>probably neither. more attractive = / = better, since a lot of guys, not just MIT ones, are sl_ts. The number of truly good men at any college are probably all equally low.</p>
<p>The same goes for girls.</p>
<p>(and likely, the majority of people in general)</p>
<p>I am an unrepentant manslut.</p>
<p>^ that implies you are actually able to get laid, and i don't think that's true</p>
<p>^ Hookem, you're gonna need some ice.</p>
<p>For that massive BURN!</p>
<p>mcb52, dude! That was haaarsh! I for one dig a bit of a southern accent. Hookem, honey.. call me ;)</p>