Are you Beautiful enough?...

<p>I don't know what that thing is, but I've noticed whenever it does show up, it's in a message that gets garbled; lines typed in editing appear before those typed originally.</p>

<p>It resembles a date ( 2, 19, 2009, lol), but I don't know enough about forum modules/IRC to recognize it as anything.</p>

<p>IndiaRubber, would you say I have a large ego, a medium ego, a small ego, or a tiny ego?
;)</p>

<p>O: Very weird.</p>

<p>And I'll say you have a medium/large ego - but I think it's fully justified. :)</p>

<p>Yeah, I mean, it's probably just a scripting error, but I really have no clue what it is. These threads are HTML compliant so maybe........gah, whatevs. </p>

<p>Medium/Large......and justified?</p>

<p>Cool deal!</p>

<p>"whatevs"!?</p>

<p>I'm afraid I'm going to have to retract my last statement. ;)</p>

<p>^ I was intentionally using 'whatevs'</p>

<p>You guys.. does Yale do co-ed rooms? If so, I believe the term would be "get one". ;)</p>

<p>^ Yale still doesn't have gender neutral housing.</p>

<p>So, yes, if you were to go to say....Saybrook! (lol) There would be guys/girls there. </p>

<p>But not on the same floor.</p>

<p>Gender as it relates to housing rules is motivated by parental (read, antiquarian) fears of sex. Since most parents imagine their little girl being nailed by a guy (which they assume couldn't have happened in highschool, of course), it's completely verboten in their minds for a guy/girl to be sharing living space - LET ALONE A BATHROOM, DUN DUN DUN!</p>

<p>Of course, this completely ignores the massive array of sexuality seen in human beings.</p>

<p>Whatever, it's not like you'll be unable to make friends of the opposite sex.
Or have sex with members of the opposite sex. Or the same sex. Whichever.</p>

<p>Haha, thanks. Though I was referring to you and IndiaRubber with your blatant flirting :P</p>

<p>IndiaRubber's not really my type. lol</p>

<p>( I mean absolutely no offense to IndiaRubber.)</p>

<p>Have you two facebooked each other?</p>

<p>What is your type? And you're not allowed to say Emma Watson.</p>

<p>We have facebooked eachother, yes. And, alas, Collegehopefull isn't mine either! I didn't mean to 'flirt', I just think he has some smart things to say and says them well.:)</p>

<p>EDIT: This, friends, is my type: <a href="http://static9.servers.fueldev.tv/9/RJ/S/SW/SWA/SWA.trans_extension_jpg_max_side_780.jpg%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://static9.servers.fueldev.tv/9/RJ/S/SW/SWA/SWA.trans_extension_jpg_max_side_780.jpg&lt;/a> </p>

<p>Rawr.</p>

<p>So what types are each of you?</p>

<p>I'm 75% Italian and 25% East-African but look more like an odd-Asian mix. I'm very weird looking- huge, reddish-brown hair and black eyes.
I'm not conventionally attractive, I suppose, but I have my charm ;)</p>

<p>I don't know my 'type'. </p>

<p>I know what I like, but there doesn't seem to be much of a pattern, apart from skin tone. (and even that's a bit iffy)</p>

<p>^ I'd say you're South-Asian-turned-preppy-WASP, if that's a type.</p>

<p>Except I've never identified with South Asia.</p>

<p>I'd say preppy WASP, minus the religious affiliate one would expect from a WAS*P*.</p>

<p>Even then, only at times.
I like to think people are complex enough that personality labels are inherently inadequate.</p>

<p>Of course they are. But they do well in expressing a general idea of what one looks-like ( mind you, I was referring to your <em>physical type</em> and nothing more)</p>

<p>Uh.</p>

<p>I think when people ask "What's your type?", they're referring to other people with respect to you.</p>

<p>So, my type wouldn't be anything to do with me, but rather girls I was interested in.</p>

<p>Us Italian Stallions gotta stick together</p>

<p>Oh wow. And it is in times like these that I feel I must pull out my English-as-a-third-language card.</p>

<p>I totally Italianized that expression - whoops!</p>