<p>Just purely for fun, what do you guys think about the attractiveness of the students at each HYPS school?</p>
<p>From what I heard, Yale and Princeton have pretty good looking girls while Harvard and Stanford are quite lacking.</p>
<p>The student body at a school changes every single year. How can you actually make a lasting judgment?</p>
<p>Princeton: 4900
Yale: 5300
Harvard: 6700
Stanford: 6800</p>
<p>With this many students, presumably one could find suitable girls or guys.</p>
<p>For purposes of comparison, I would give Stanford the edge simply because it is the least likely of the four to have students completely bundled in five layers of warm clothes.</p>
<p>no matter how bad the girls there may be, the girls at UChicago are pocket aces in ugly</p>
<p>I don't know about UChicago being that bad. There is a really hot chick from my school going there</p>
<p>there's always the exception :P</p>
<p>For attractiveness I think</p>
<p>Yale = Stanford > Princeton > Harvard</p>
<p>When I look at my old yearbooks, it amuses (and confounds me somewhat) to recall that as a youth, I could classify my classmates of the opposite sex in what seemed to me a fairly precise continuum of attractiveness. </p>
<p>Looking at those pictures now, those same faces seem to me to occupy a fairly narrow range of youthful beauty: pretty, but unmarked by those life experiences that combine to give rise to that je ne sais quois that characterizes truly attractive women. That, I'm afraid, is nearly possible for any woman to achieve before her fortieth birthday.</p>
<p>FWIW, one of the hottest girls in my graduating class (and the Val) is at Yale.</p>
<p>although I agree with what Greybeard mostly said, if you start dating women aged 40 while you're in college, you will receive strange looks from everybody.</p>