Hey all,
A few days ago I posted on here asking if running out of tests is an issue, and it doesn’t seem to be so I started devouring some SATs, and after about 7 (of which I only did the 3 math sections) - I can see some trends. My scores are: 2 740s, 2 750s, a 760, a 730, and one which didn’t have a scoring table, but the raw was 51. Here’s how, on average, it goes down.
- I'll go through the section, I'll generally skip 1 or 2 problems, and I'll be finished with the hardest ones in about 16 minutes for the 25 min sections, or 12ish for the 20 minute sections.
- Here, if I think I'm close to figuring out or solving the ones I skipped, I'll go do those and then I'll go back and check. If not, I leave them and just go straight to checking, hopefully I'll have some extra time.
- I go back through the section, re-reading the questions and re-doing the math for every question. I call this process 'micro-checking' and I make sure to read the directions very carefully and to do the math very carefully. At some point in the prep process I realized that all problems are made up of steps. For example: 1. Solve for variable, 2. Plug variable in, solve for second variable, 3. Add two variables together. I then understood that each of these steps contained processes (such as adding, subtracting, distributing, carrying minuses, etc) which held a potential for having a mistake be made. Through the tests that I did, I got decent at being able to bullet (for lack of a better word) in my head these steps, and then to check them. This pretty much guarantees that your checking over a problem will spot errors, UNLESS you have errors in your initial reasoning (for example: you didn't take something into account. I call those content errors, as opposed to careless errors, which is what we're checking for) and you solved the problem wrong. In general, this checking is what takes up the remaining 8 or 9 minutes.
My consistent problem that I’m seeing is that in general, I’ll leave around 3 problems blank for the test, or around 1 problem per section (giving me a raw of 51 - sometimes, I’ll miss 1 or 2, sometimes I’ll leave 2 blank on a section, but my raw averages 51/52). The reason I’m leaving these blank is because I don’t see the quick solution I’m supposed to see for them. Basically, on these problems, I’ll start plugging in, or doing some form of long mathematics which will still get me to the answer, but I simply don’t have time for them.
Now, obviously, this sounds like a content weakness, but the problem is, it happens on so many diverse types of problems that I don’t know what to study, and a lot of times, that same area of math (be it exponent rules, or combinations, or listing or whatever) I will have done well on in other tests - ergo I’m not necessarily bad at that… I just… I don’t know, that’s the thing, I don’t know why I’m seeing this pattern and what I can do to fix it. If it helps, this generally happens on the medium or harder problems.
Any advice you guys have would be greatly appreciated. Here’s a tip I gathered from my own introspection and watching of this problem:
- It SEEMS like they're content weaknesses. For example, I noticed that if I'm given a geometry problem (be it area, perimeter, shaded region, pretty much anything geometry-related, not including right triangles) I'm super fast on it, If that's a number 20, I can do that in 45 seconds. Now, where does this ability with geometry come from? That, I don't know, it just makes sense to me, I remember when I was in those classes, for some reason, that particular area of math I was really good at. Maybe the key is achieving a similar level of competence with the other concepts? How can I do that? Perhaps through enough drills? But they have to be SAT questions, don't they, I don't have access to 200 SAT questions of a specific type to practice with...
One last thing (Sorry for the massive post, I really do appreciate all of your help) - I’m not necessarily going for an 800, but I’m trying to eliminate weakness patterns that I see. If I’m constantly doing 770-790s and what I mess up is just the odd weird problem that I didn’t see, then that’s cool, I’ll settle with that, that has no pattern, but here I’m seeing something, which is why I feel like there’s a targeted way to fix it.
Thank you so much, looking forward to your comments!