<p>I'm a junior in mechanical engineering. Over the years, I've noticed that my hands-on abilities are at best, average. In my opinion, I'm below average. </p>
<p>I know that hands-on abilities are something you develop over time. As an example, in my machining class, I had a hard time remembering how to use a lathe and milling machine after the instructor showed us. Part of this was because I've never heard of a lathe and milling machine until the class. It was hard to memorize all the instructions. Some other students had problems with this, but I felt stupid. It takes me a good while to get good at these things, much longer than most other people IMO, but once I get good at it, I end up doing better on projects than my peers for some odd reason.</p>
<p>In all the other classes (pretty much just problem solving classes), I am usually near the top. But I feel all the stuff I'm good at are useless in practical engineering situations and that I won't make a good engineer if I suck at hands-on work. </p>
<p>I plan on going to graduate school. Do you guys think being bad at hands-on work will affect research skills? What research areas in AE/ME involve less hands-on work?</p>
<p>I can always improve, but I would prefer doing something I'm better at.</p>