<p>i am really fed up with barron cos many of its questions require graphic calculator, which i have none!!!!barron really sucks.</p>
<p>uhh or scientific calculator, right? -- I'm using Barron's Math II too</p>
<p>How do you not have a graphing calculator, on the real test it's expected that you have one and CB has saind 55-60% require the need of one.</p>
<p>Many, many questions require a graphing calculator on the real exam. If you don't have one, I'd suggest going out ASAP and buying a TI-84.</p>
<p>Barron's is way way way way harder than the actual test. I used it and was making 690s on practice tests and made a 800 on the actual. Use PR.</p>
<p>Honestly it isn't Barron's fault... it's easier to have a graphic calc on the the real test to. Allows you to zoom through questions.</p>
<p>Barrons is the best test prep for Math II, sure it's ridiculously hard but if you can somewhat master the Barrons practice test it's gonna be a 750+ on the real Math II sure thing.</p>
<p>YEah...IT's not Barron's fault. I think this is attributed to your own ignorance. It's called the math IIC test; the C OBVIOUSLY stands for Calculator. Borrow a calculator from your teacher or buy one. Stop whining.</p>
<p>The College Board states that a calculator "may be useful or necessary" for about 55-60% of the questions on the test. The College Board also encourages the use of a graphing calculator over a scientific calculator. It also says that this test was "developed with the expectation that most students are using graphing calculators."</p>
<p>What kind of idiot doesn't have a graphing calculator and plans to take Math II. *** did you use for pre calc?</p>