<p>How are they? I know that, in most cases, the content they present and the questions accompanying it are significantly harder than the corresponding AP exams. However, shouldn't reviewing from a book that is harder than the real test make the real test a breeze? Take AP Calculus, for example. The questions in it are much harder than other review books for the exams; shouldn't this prepare one for the test much more efficiently? Or does it have a negative effect?</p>
<p>They do tend to be more in-depth, which I think is a good thing, but some people prefer the more bare-bones method. If I had to just choose one review book, I’d go with Barrons though</p>
<p>The AP US one I have just give sample questions and sample essay topics while not summarizing the different periods first like the “Fast Track” one does. I actually like the Fast Track book a lot better surprisingly enough, even though it isn’t the “leading choice by student.”</p>
<p>Usually very good.</p>
<p>Barrons is good if you need that in-depth, comprehensive review of the subject. But I personally am looking for a review book that just discusses what you need to know for the exam. I rely on my teachers and textbook to actually learn the material, so I’m just looking for a good source to review the material I need to know. In many cases, I found PR and 5 Steps much better for that purpose (though Barrons AP Psych was the best) I guess it’s all about individual preferences.</p>
<p>Barron’s AP Psych is amazing.</p>