<p>It's absolutely true, and quite false too. Thousands of students do fit within this description. I had a housemate who was Cantonese-American from Sacramento, who seemed to hang out with other Cantonese-Americans from Sacramento most of her college career. Kind of sad actually...</p>
<p>However, Berkeley is so large that the segment of students who don't segregate along racial/ethnic lines, which comprises perhaps half to two thirds of campus, is a huge community within which everybody socializes and reaches out to other ethnicities. You see that for example in football games, where the student section swellls to 8,000 for the Big Game. Every color in the rainbow under the Blue and Gold, a beautiful sight! </p>
<p>It's also true that there are a tons of Asians and other minorities who are eager to interact and learn about other cultures. I've gained valuable cultural insight into many parts of the world from my close interactions in class and outside with students from other ethnicities. For instance, I took one year of Mandarin and got a lot of exposure to the culture through socializing with Chinese and Chinese-American students. Another roommate was from Beijing, he was very eager to learn about American culture and other cultures represented on campus, we had great conversations about his country, about food, politics, economics and many other cultural issues. I've had similar interactions with representatives of countless other nationalities and ethnicities (that list would be incredibly long, from full-blood Lakota Native American to Lithuanian.)</p>
<p>That was really helpful in business, as one startup I worked for was Taiwanese-owned. Berkeley had prepared me well to do business in Taipei. No other top school is so well geared towards Asia, which is a great advantage given that the continent is the focus of economic growth in our lifetime.</p>
<p>The other side of the coin in terms of diversity is the socio-economic dimension, where Berkeley is far, far more diverse than just about any other top university. From a recent student survey:</p>
<p>
[quote]
To the best of your knowledge, which category includes the total annual combined income of your parent(s) before taxes in 2004?
600 (5.5%) Less than 10,000
746 (6.9%) 10,000 to 19,999
1263 (11.6%) 20,000 to 34,999
1047 (9.6%) 35,000 to 49,999
1064 (9.8%) 50,000 to 64,999
1018 (9.4%) 65,000 to 79,999
1192 (10.9%) 80,000 to 99,999
1573 (14.4%) 100,000 to 124,999
693 (6.4%) 125,000 to 149,999
782 (7.2%) 150,000 to 199,999
909 (8.3%) 200,000 or more
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Even at other top public schools like Michigan or Virginia, the rate of socio-economically disadvataged or less affluent students is drastically lower (only about 10%). High-end academia has become the near-exclusive domain of the wealthy, but not at Berkeley, where your dorm hallway will have the son of a custodian and the heiress of a fortune living side by side.</p>