<p>ya you said there were none. There was a big one at the world trade center. You say it was bushes fault. With that logic, the world trade center attack in 2001 was clintons fault.</p>
<p>don't be mad. at least the pack play in a blue state right?</p>
<p>fyi:</p>
<p>Attacks on mulitary is one thing; attacks on civilians is another. </p>
<p>Please dont try to be like Dubya. Dubya is an idiot, but you are getting close!!</p>
<p>"the world trade center attack in 2001 was clintons fault."</p>
<p>i can agree on that. Please take a reading lesson! When did I ever say that Clinton didnt have any responsibility for 9/11 attacks? You are arguing for no reason. HAHAHA</p>
<p>Awww.. Conservatives, what will they say next?!</p>
<p>1993 killed civilians....it was also aimed at the wtc.</p>
<p>1993 killed civilians....it was also aimed at the wtc.</p>
<p>Like I said, it was Bush Sr.'s fault. Read my posts more than once please!</p>
<p>HOW?????!?!??! CLINTON was the president was he not?</p>
<p>not quite as much an idiot as your lib ass. How bout you go wave your kerry banners some more.</p>
<p>"Clinton did not anticipate such an attack. However, Bush can be blamed for escalating the risk for another attack."</p>
<p>first you say it wasn't his fault, then u turn around and run your mouth saying it was his fault. Make up your damn liberal mind</p>
<p>HOW?????!?!??! CLINTON was the president was he not?</p>
<p>Clinton became president in 1992. Attacks took place in 1993. Obviously foreingn affairs during Bush Sr.'s administation was the cause of the attack.</p>
<p>Similarly, Bill Clinton had some responsibilities for 9/11. The attacks took place on 2001, just a year after Dubya's election. See the similarity?</p>
<p>"not quite as much an idiot as your lib ass. How bout you go wave your kerry banners some more."</p>
<p>I bet you are smart................... (sarcastic).</p>
<p>Clinton did not anticipate such an attack</p>
<p>You are dumber than I thought. Clinton didnt know when the attacks would have happened but he couldve taken actions to prevent it from ever happening. Boy, how dumb conservatives can get!!</p>
<p>And the above quote and "Clinton not responsibe" doesnt mean anything alike.</p>
<p>"but he couldve taken actions to prevent it from ever happening"</p>
<p>Prove it!!!</p>
<p>Prove it!!!</p>
<p>haha. Same thing could be said about Bush Sr. and 1993 attacks. Why dont YOU "prove it?"</p>
<p>1 william henry harrison
2 james buchanan
3 millard filmore
4 harding
5 taft</p>
<p>haha. Same thing could be said about Bush Sr. and 1993 attacks. Why dont YOU "prove it?"</p>
<p>Because I never said he could take actions to prevent it thats why....</p>
<p>So who's fault are the 1993 attacks? and the 9/11 attacks? Are they bothe Clinton's fault? Explain how!! LOL</p>
<p>they are the terrorists fault who committed these horrible acts</p>
<p>all threads on politics end up the exact same way in the end</p>
<p>yeah! locked by the moderator!!! haha</p>
<p>on another note....you can't lay the blame on those who didn't comit the act....if a mugger comes out of an alley and beats/robs a harmless individual on his/her way home, you can't blame the person for being defenseless.</p>
<p>.if a mugger comes out of an alley and beats/robs a harmless individual on his/her way home, you can't blame the person for being defenseless.</p>
<p>What if the mugger threatened to harm you in advance? What if you had the choice of calling the cops to catch the mugger.</p>
<p>I am relating this to laden's tapes and how bush is neglecting his capture.</p>
<p>"they are the terrorists fault who committed these horrible acts"</p>
<p>Dont we have intelligence to track down these terrorist activities?</p>