<p>What if your a smart person...who is a little shy...but not totally shy...and can spit game when he wants to...and can start up a convo when he wants to...not a super social person...is that a nerd...or a playa?</p>
<p>Maybe those guys were right about most women wanting to date worthless scum ****s who don't deserve to breathe. Oh well!</p>
<p>Scareya, that's inbetween.</p>
<p>How about those girls that don't want to date?</p>
<p>Scareya: "Spit game?"</p>
<p>it's a gansta term ppl use here...running game = spitting game</p>
<p>
[quote]
Game - verb - game is an inate attribute that some people posess which allows them to sweet talk members of the opposite sex, or even members of their own sex to achive a desired outcome. Acting in this manner is known as 'running game'. An intricacy of running game is that the merit of the game being run is questionable, meaning that the person 'running game' may only be saying what they are to recieve the outcome they desire. SYN: Mac USAGE: Damn you pimp juice, the game is too strong!!
[/quote]
</p>
<p>source: <a href="http://www.uwm.edu/%7Ebriancw2/dictionary.html#s%5B/url%5D">http://www.uwm.edu/~briancw2/dictionary.html#s</a></p>
<p>btw..i guess im an in between...although i rarely spit game...cuz im not like that</p>
<p>ok last post i swearrr. frickin procrastination.</p>
<p>so what i meant inside the question: do you value security (at the price of boredom) or adventure (at the price of physical and emotional damage) more?</p>
<p>and my answer was security. so yes, i think we can conclude now that many girls value adventure over security and guys as well (?). though i think guys generally tend to say they like "sluts", but actually don't like them, except to look at. so i'd say guys might value security more.</p>
<p>ok self-control have...to...study. bye.</p>
<p>you bring up a good point...its a struggle between security and adventure...and if you can...you might find someone who's got both</p>
<p>why cant you just look for both?</p>
<p>its not that difficult...ive been rather successful this far even with these apparent high standards.</p>
<p>ok last post. anyways, i just wanted to see what ppl were more attracted to in relationships. and i would have to say adventure (for girls). bcuz only 2 boys answered the question. so when ppl are always saying why do my relationships never work?, the answer is most likely: cuz you're looking for the wrong type of person (subconsciously). if you can find both, its hard, bcuz they're contradictory: ex- a person who parties and is a playa but also is loyal only to you and shy? </p>
<p>anyways interesting discussion. ok the end.</p>
<p>Yeah, but someone that's adventurous doesn't have to be a player, and someone that's loyal doesn't have to be a nerd.</p>
<p>What about all the outdoorsy guys, they've got to be the prototypes for adventurous and loyal guys.</p>
<p>You're totally right ^. But what are the chances you get a loyal playa?</p>
<p>Does hunting and plinking count as outdoorsy?</p>
<p>Well, I was going more for the fisher, camper, hiker type, but...</p>
<p>I see where you're coming from...but that's a different type of adventurous.</p>
<p>It's still some type of adventurous.</p>
<p>Camping is yucky. Fishing is ok. Hiking has no value to me.</p>
<p>But camping can be really fun if you're with a ton of friends!</p>
<p>So is streaking.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>It's fun until the skunks decide to pay the area outside of your tents a little visit...and you can't go to sleep until you're sure the skunk is gone.</p>
<p>Well, adventurous really doesn't come to my mind when I think about what she was explaining.</p>
<p>Also, I usually have more problems with raccoons than with skunks.</p>