<p>It probably doesn't make much of a difference, but hypothetically what would be the more valuable work experience from the perspective of someone in admissions at a top MBA:</p>
<p>1) Working for a small regional investment firm most likely as a financial advisor, possibly in IBD or equity research.</p>
<p>2) Working at a national commercial bank.</p>
<p>3) Working at a Big Four accounting firm.</p>
<p>I go to a small state school a long way away from the hustle and bustle of Wall Street, but I would like to get there someday after achieving an MBA. Which of these presents the best scenario?</p>
<p>I don't know, but if your goal is Wall Street, I wouldn't think a Big 4 accounting firm would be the right route for you to go. Aside from that, if successful at a Big 4 firm, you may not want an MBA. It is my understanding that MBAs don't hold that much weight there (ie you don't need one to get partner..you do need to be a CPA though).</p>
<p>Thanks for the info. Although its not a big deal, I think the Big Four idea might be the best not only because of the prestigious name on the resume, but because they are the only employers with national recognition that actively recruit on my campus. I don't really want to do accounting for a living, but I understand that it is a great preparation for a variety of industries. If I got my CPA and did two years at a big firm, it seems like I would have a lot of options post MBA.</p>