<p>How accurate do you think it is, and what is yours?</p>
<p>It’s pretty inaccurate for athletes, body fat percentage is much better. My BMI is ~22 but that’s definitely an overestimation of my body fat.</p>
<p>18.9. i suppose it’s pretty accurate, though body fat percentage would be a better indicator of overall health.</p>
<p>BMI doesn’t take muscle into account. 
but besides that…
Mine is 19.5 at the moment.</p>
<p>Trying to eat healthier xD
(and not a diet… just not unnecessary amounts of junk food)</p>
<p>BMI = 17 apparently. 5’9" 115</p>
<p>16 or something clothes…I’m soo buff though</p>
<p>I don’t think BMI should be used. It doesn’t take into account all aspects of a person’s build. It seems to add fuel to the eating disorder fire. Too heavy, too light…etc., etc, when really a person is perfectly healthy. Mine is 17.5.</p>
<p>16.7 10char</p>
<p>17.6</p>
<p>I finally outgrew being “the scrawny little guy” a couple years ago.</p>
<p>And yes, I agree that BMIs are a bad way to judge health.</p>
<p>Mine’s higher but I’m an athlete. You also have to separate by sex.</p>
<p>BMI 16.7 ----> 5’6.5 and 105 pounds
I am a cross country runner though…
I don’t know if that changes how accurate it is</p>
<p>21.7</p>
<p>(Approximate).</p>
<p>^^ Well BMI calculators usually overestimate body fat for athletes but that’s because of above average muscle mass. I guess it’s different for cross country runners.</p>