Bruin Cheerleaders. Hot?

<p>Ben, if we're #3, I'd hate to see #10.</p>

<p>Just saying. </p>

<p>(That goes for both sexes).</p>

<p>But it was a rather obscure magazine, so I wouldn't count on it too much.</p>

<p>Have you ever been to SDSU?</p>

<p>Lots of pretty people. Don't have to try as hard. Don't have to be terribly smart.</p>

<p>Not that SDSU is a bad school, but it's admissions standards are very, very far from ours. </p>

<p>Same deal with SC. Easier to get into. Still a good school, but easier admittance. Pretty people, trained by society to not have to try as hard, gravitate towards the easyishness. </p>

<p>/I'm kidding, kinda. Don't necessarily stand by those statements. But that's an actual theory I've heard thrown around in discussion. Take it as you will.</p>

<p>yeah i see what you're saying. they're more immature.</p>

<p>Your theory has a certain amount of validity. </p>

<p>But seriously, who really wants to work or study everyday?</p>

<p>I wouldn't mind going to SDSU :)</p>

<p>Yeah, I don't.</p>

<p>So I don't.</p>

<p>So are you still interning there?</p>

<p>Yep. But yknow. Part time.</p>

<p>not too many people want to ONLY work or study but we find a balance. SDSU and UCSB only party</p>

<p>there's nothing wrong with just partying.</p>

<p>until one graduates that is.</p>

<p>Psh. There are soooooo many things to do other than partying but not studying. I study very, very little in the scheme of things, but I really barely "party" at all. So yknow. </p>

<p>/I think I'd be just as bored partying all the time as I would be studying all the time.</p>

<p>ah, your preoccupation with cc is demistified.</p>

<p>Hahah. Well, partially. Let's also keep in mind that I work in front of the computer for 24 hours a week and yet only have like 10 total hours of actual work to do. That leaves soooooo much time for the refresh button spread out over a few different interweb places. </p>

<p>I have no excuses for the weekends though. Hopefully my social life might benefit from school starting.</p>

<p>i hear ya. UCLA starting late takes a blow to social life when everyone else has left 2-4 weeks ago. which is why i'm here posting now...</p>

<p>everyone has left...but this last week of freedom will be so sweet!</p>

<p>Lol. Well, after a very necessary downsizing in the friends department, 99% of the friends I still have go to UCLA. So that's not really the problem.</p>

<p>I just need cooler friends in general. These ones don't really do anything. That's totally the goal for this year.</p>

<p>Gah it's 12. InNOut time, Yo.</p>

<p>Hang out with the cool freshmen, yo. Enjoy your In and Out dessert.</p>

<p>psh dinner. i'm hardcore like that.</p>

<p>My current theory is the hotness of girls at a school is directly correlated to the campus's distance to the equator and inversely correlated to the strength of admissions to the school (i.e. lower admissions = hotter). I've done research into the subject but have yet to formulate my official theorem, but I think my theory is solid and when I have a proof I will let you know.</p>