<p>I went out, yay! Well, I did, to help out a friend figure out what part of his fin. aid he hasn't completed.</p>
<p>There, my social life at a glance.</p>
<p>Back to the topic. SC birds are definitely hot. I wonder what their graduate rate is. I wouldn't be surprised if it's below 75%. Quite high on the hotness factor, though.</p>
<p>See, McGizzle backs up the admissions theory.</p>
<p>Yay it might have merit.</p>
<p>that's some crazy theory you have there. Get it published!</p>
<p>I agree. SC girls destroy LA ones....</p>
<p>...For the most part.</p>
<p>While I've done my fair share of bashing on LA chicks, some of us can step up to the SC airheads. Promise.</p>
<p>i saw many attractive girls when i went to the ucla campus :)</p>
<p>USC Cheerleader Fails At Cheering:</p>
<p><a href="http://uscfails.ytmnd.com%5B/url%5D">http://uscfails.ytmnd.com</a> :rolleyes:</p>
<p>I found this: <a href="http://www.c%5B/url%5D">http://www.c</a> o l l e g e p r o w l e r .com/guides<em>by</em>rankings.asp/10 <--- without the spaces</p>
<p>But I recall there was another ranking on this subject.</p>
<p>I go to SDSU, we party pretty hard, but you'll find the libraries are surprisingly filled up nightly and especially during finals week. So believe it or not, it's probably the perfect equilibrium between great parties and a decent education.</p>
<p>^ What does that have to do with Bruin cheerleaders?</p>
<p>lol Cal is C</p>
<p>"Back to the topic. SC birds are definitely hot. I wonder what their graduate rate is. I wouldn't be surprised if it's below 75%. Quite high on the hotness factor, though."</p>
<p>Actually, USC has a MUCH higher for-year grad rate than UCLA (US News) -- any private school will. That extra money we pay? It goes to making sure there are few classes with waitlists and advisors know us by first name.</p>
<p>I understand the "easier-to-get-into school = hotter chicks" theory though (USC being the exception). Prime example? ASU.</p>
<p>
[quote]
Actually, USC has a MUCH higher fo(u)r-year grad rate than UCLA (US News) -- any private school will.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>I don't think either of your claims are true.</p>
<p>According to the Princeton Review:</p>
<p>USC</p>
<p>
[quote]
Admission Stats
Freshmen Returning for Sophomore Year: 95%
Freshmen Graduating in 4 years: 61%
Freshmen Graduating in 6 years: 83%
[/quote]
</p>
<p>UCLA</p>
<p>
[quote]
Freshmen Returning for Sophomore Year: 97%
Freshmen Graduating in 4 years: 57%
Freshmen Graduating in 6 years: 87%
[/quote]
</p>
<p>"MUCH higher?" I'm not so sure I would call the small difference of 4% "MUCH higher."</p>
<p>To disprove your second claim:</p>
<p>Reed College</p>
<p>
[quote]
Freshmen Returning for Sophomore Year: 85%
Freshmen Graduating in 4 years: 52%
Freshmen Graduating in 6 years: 73%
[/quote]
</p>
<p>I thought the chicks at UCLA were OK...but then that was during the summer and orientation...:rolleyes:</p>
<p>DRab,</p>
<p>Actually, I was going off of US News, not PR, but I double-checked and I am indeed wrong -- UCLA has a slightly higher graduation rate. However, both are tied in the 2007 edition's "Selectivity Ranking," proving that if McGizzle's theory holds true "hotness is related to distance from the equator and inversely correlated with higher admissions standards," and USC girls are hotter (no one's refuted this yet), then USC is an exception.</p>
<p>DRab,</p>
<p>Actually, I was going off of US News, not PR, but I double-checked and I am indeed wrong -- UCLA has a slightly higher graduation rate. However, both are tied in the 2007 edition's "Selectivity Ranking," and both have the same acceptance rate of 27%, proving that if McGizzle's theory holds true "hotness is related to distance from the equator and inversely correlated with higher admissions standards," and USC girls are hotter (no one's refuted this yet), then USC is an exception.</p>
<p>You have to factor in economic status as well.</p>
<p>Certainly the correlation could exist, and it could be very high. One outlier doesn't proove or disproove that much (such as Reed's graduation rate). :)</p>
<p>OH c'mon! There are plenty of hot chicks at UCLA. The cheerleaders, hot or not, are NOT all the chicks UCLA has to offer. I know plenty of pretty girls there [mostly asian] and I always see hot white girls, and I'm not even a student there yet.</p>
<p>It really just depends on who you know and who you hang out with. There are plenty of girls - you just have to find them [hint: north campus]. I think the complaints are from people who want to be able to sit down at Ackerman and watch a runway show. Not gonna happen.</p>
<p>
You mean the rich, spoiled, blonde, sorority cheerleaders? :rolleyes:</p>