That comment got really long, so I’m going to get into my experience at Queen’s here.
I loved my first semester. My residence is great, my floor is tight knit, I’ve found great housing with a great bunch of guys, and I love Queen’s, and have developed a degree of fondness for Kingston.
Queen’s is very much a community, the parties and social life is great, and the extracurricular are awesome. QSB is also really tight knit, and Goodes hall is an amazing building, with a ton of space and resources. Academically, I love the program. All of my profs (but one) are great. The accessibility of Profs, TAs and the like is amazing, and being able to get in touch with a prof is something that will be incredibly helpful academically. QSB clearly has a ton of resources, and makes good use of them. Classes are small, topping out at 70 students, meaning you actually get to participate.
Extracurricular allow you to get involved by both organizing and participating in events.I’m the frosh rep for one association myself. Industry leaders like Arlene Dickinson frequently speak at these events, not to mention the networking and the fact they are a good time (free alcohol!).
I already have one placement arranged at a global corporate services firm (not big four), and am working with the careers office when I get back to make a few more options.
One thing PBS points out is true: the prescribed nature of QC means that you have limited options to explore other interests. I would have like a few electives. However, the advantage of this is that QC students get far better early year placements then their counterparts at Ivey or Desautels, since they already have much more business specific knowledge. There are pros and cons to the QC system. What you value more is really up to the student.
To sum up, as objectively as possible, what came up in this thread.
QC offers
- Tight knit community both with Queen's and the school of business due to smaller size.
- Student city
- Better early year placements due to program structure.
- More recruitment, better opportunists, and better placement, as objectively show by the employment reports posted above (this wasn't disputed).
- Most developed international exchange program in Canada.
- Smaller class sizes, better Academic support, teaching emphasis in faculty
- University itself, and QSB has more money, isn't in financial trouble, lacks infamous bureaucracy
McGill offers:
- Larger, more diverse student body
- Greater international reputation as a university (that is not as recognized by employers)
- Better city
Now, it isn’t inherently wrong to decide that YOU prefer McGill to QC. But as a program, in terms of resources, opportunities, and support, QC is objectively the better option. Don’t get caught in the hype of prestige or internationalism. Make a decision based on what you value, and the opportunities that you will be afforded. Get your information from objective data (not from me or PBS). Research the program structures. What appeals to you? Do ou want a bigger, more diverse student body, or a smaller, more tight knit community? Talk to your friends, find you their experiences.
I’m not a McGill student. I don’t know what being at the school is like first-hand. All I know is what my brother (a McGill grad) and friends tell me.
What I can tell you is that Queen’s is a phenomenal experience, and I strongly recommend iit.