<p>
[quote]
Yes, that is how US News ranks MBA programs, but I personally think they should be ranked by income. The higher the income usually means the more desirable the applicant is, and that's what really matters considering your ultimate goal is to get the best job/most money possible. If anyone goes into business and claims they are not out to make money, then they are in business for the wrong reasons.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Well, actually, I know plenty of people who pursue MBA's that aren't primarily trying to maximize their income. If that's all that every MBA student wanted, then everybody would be stampeding into investment banking and private equity. Instead, they are looking for a job that gives them proper work-life balance and a high quality of life. In fact, most (probably all) top MBA programs now run extensive workshops that discuss how to balance your career with the other aspects of your life (i.e. family) or how to obtain a job that may not pay you that well in the beginning but that can serve to aid you later in life.</p>
<p>As a case in point, Fortune Magazine recently reported that the #1 most desired employer of new MBA's is now Google. But Google is far from the highest paying employer out there. Google doesn't pay as much as consulting does, and certainly not as much as banking. MBA's who work at Google are effectively taking a pay cut. Nor are they likely to get rich off of Google stock options, as Google's IPO was completed 3 years ago, and frankly, Google's stock price is unlikely to exhibit explosive growth relative to its already rich valuation of today; hence nobody who joins Google today is likely to get rich. Yet top MBA students are still flocking to Google. Why? Because they see it as a foundation step to building their career. Via Google, they can later launch a startup or work at another tech company, or something else.</p>
<p>Similarly, a lot of MBA's from the top programs, and especially from the more entrepreneurial programs (i.e. Stanford, MIT Sloan, etc.) start their own companies right after graduation, or often times even before they graduate. However, startups rarely make much money in their first few years of existence and certainly don't pay high salaries to the founders during the lean years. In fact, I can think of a number of new MBA's who are effectively making a salary of $0 right now as startup founders. {But of course, if their startup makes it big, they'll be millionaires}. </p>
<p>Finally, certain business specialities are noteworthy for just not paying that well, but also offering a higher quality of life. Operations management, for example, has always been a laggard when it comes to pay, but also tends to offer a relatively less stressful work environment. Those schools that specialize in ops management (i.e. MIT Sloan) would exhibit lower average starting salaries due to the high percentage of graduates who choose ops jobs. I know one Sloan MBA who took an ops job at Intel who only works 3 days a week. Granted, she's working 14 hours a day during those 3 days (as she has to manage an entire 12-hour shift in the fab, plus a couple extra hours a day for transition and group meetings), but the point is, she gets to enjoy a 4-day weekend every week to do whatever she wants. If she wants to fly to Hawaii, where her family is, every weekend, she can do it. Obviously she isn't getting paid as well as those Sloan MBA's who went to consulting or especially banking, but she enjoys a far far higher quality of life. Heck, most investment bankers get "zero-day" weekends. </p>
<p>The point is, income, especially starting income, is a distorted metric with which to measure MBA programs. Plenty of people who pursue MBA's are doing so without intending to obtain the highest-paying job they can get, and certainly as a starting job. Quality of life is probably the most important goal of all.</p>