Hi all,
I am looking to be a philosophy major at UChicago. After I get my 4-year degree, I plan on applying to law school.
I am not that good at math and would not enjoy taking calculus, however, I want to add rigor to my schedule to increase my chances of getting accepted to UChicago.
I’ve long thought that every engineer should take classes in language and either literature or the arts, and it should not be possible to gets philosophy degree without a math class that requires proofs.
@50N40W : I agree with that - the philosophy major needing to take a math as a requirement for their degree. Math and philosophy make a strong duo; they compliment each other.
As a now graduate student in philosophy, having done a triple subject undergrad in politics (lots of analytic/math work), philosophy and psychology and then completed a law degree, I personally don’t think calculus is useful and I don’t think a math class with proofs is helpful at all.
Personally, I took AP calc in my Jr. year of high school and then never went near another formal math class ever again. Formal logic requires an understanding of abstract reasoning, but I do not think that Calc provides a good grounding in this particular type of abstract reasoning. Philosophy students tend to perform the best on the LSAT (though math students also perform very well).
I don’t think that a philosophy major should have to take math - as someone who does legal philosophy, there is absolutely nothing I could use math for, certainly not calculus.
This isn’t to say that math cannot be helpful to a philosophy major. This is particularly true in relation to which area of philosophy you intend to study. For example, a philosopher of mind typically has an excellent understanding of psychology and statistics, the latter being of paramount importance in understanding psychological data.